2005The TranslatorRequires access

The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies

Moira Inghilleri

Open publisher page 347 citations

Abstract

This article introduces Bourdieu’s sociological perspective and its relevance to translation and interpreting studies. It discusses Bourdieu’s key concepts – habitus, field, capital and illusio – and their contribution to theorizations of the interaction between structure and agency in sociological and philosophical debates. Considerable attention is paid to the relationship between Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the emergent interest in the ethnographic tradition within translation and interpreting studies, particularly the influence of the interpretive approach of Geertz and the subsequent work of Clifford and Marcus within the culturalist paradigm. The question of methodology is addressed in relation to Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the construction of the ‘object’ of sociological research. The article further explore show Bourdieu’s concepts may be made to work empirically within translation and interpreting research and how much this depend son embracing Bourdieu’s ontological and epistemological stance. Bourdieu’s work is briefly explored in relation to other sociological theories that have begun to emerge as relevant to translation studies, in particular the work of Latour and Luhmann, and additional future directions for research within the sociology of translation and interpreting are suggested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article introduces Bourdieu’s sociological perspective and its relevance to translation and interpreting studies. It discusses Bourdieu’s key concepts – habitus, field, capital and illusio – and their contribution to theorizations of the interaction between structure and agency in sociological and philosophical debates. Considerable attention is paid to the relationship between Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the emergent interest in the ethnographic tradition within translation and interpreting studies, particularly the influence of the interpretive approach of Geertz and the subsequent work of Clifford and Marcus within the culturalist paradigm. The question of methodology is addressed in relation to Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the construction of the ‘object’ of sociological research. The article further explore show Bourdieu’s concepts may be made to work empirically within translation and interpreting research and how much this depend son embracing Bourdieu’s ontological and epistemological stance. Bourdieu’s work is briefly explored in relation to other sociological theories that have begun to emerge as relevant to translation studies, in particular the work of Latour and Luhmann, and additional future directions for research within the sociology of translation and interpreting are suggested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 347 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article introduces Bourdieu’s sociological perspective and its relevance to translation and interpreting studies. It discusses Bourdieu’s key concepts – habitus, field, capital and illusio – and their contribution to theorizations of the interaction between structure and agency in sociological and philosophical debates. Considerable attention is paid to the relationship between Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the emergent interest in the ethnographic tradition within translation and interpreting studies, particularly the influence of the interpretive approach of Geertz and the subsequent work of Clifford and Marcus within the culturalist paradigm. The question of methodology is addressed in relation to Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and the construction of the ‘object’ of sociological research. The article further explore show Bourdieu’s concepts may be made to work empirically within translation and interpreting research and how much this depend son embracing Bourdieu’s ontological and epistemological stance. Bourdieu’s work is briefly explored in relation to other sociological theories that have begun to emerge as relevant to translation studies, in particular the work of Latour and Luhmann, and additional future directions for research within the sociology of translation and interpreting are suggested.

Key concepts: Sociology, Habitus, Reflexivity, Epistemology, Field (mathematics), Relation (database), Structure and agency, Agency (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Sociology of Bourdieu and the Construction of the ‘Object’ in Translation and Interpreting Studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens