1998Labour & Industry a journal of the social and economic relations of workRequires access

The Nature and Dimensions of Precarious Employment in Australia

John Burgess, Iain Campbell

Open publisher page 157 citations

Abstract

The quality of employment is often neglected in policy debates in Australia. Non-standard employment forms are dominating job generation in Australia. While the non-standard category is heterogeneous, it contains many jobs that exhibit characteristics of precariousness. Moreover, though precariousness is concentrated in non-standard employment, it is by no means confined to non-standard employment. Precariousness also affects parts of standard employment itself. This article is exploratory, aimed at taking up and applying the concept of precariousness to employment in Australia. It discusses the concept of precariousness, emphasising the importance of varied dimensions of labour insecurity. It then outlines the nature, spread and implications of precarious employment in Australia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The quality of employment is often neglected in policy debates in Australia. Non-standard employment forms are dominating job generation in Australia. While the non-standard category is heterogeneous, it contains many jobs that exhibit characteristics of precariousness. Moreover, though precariousness is concentrated in non-standard employment, it is by no means confined to non-standard employment. Precariousness also affects parts of standard employment itself. This article is exploratory, aimed at taking up and applying the concept of precariousness to employment in Australia. It discusses the concept of precariousness, emphasising the importance of varied dimensions of labour insecurity. It then outlines the nature, spread and implications of precarious employment in Australia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 157 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The quality of employment is often neglected in policy debates in Australia. Non-standard employment forms are dominating job generation in Australia. While the non-standard category is heterogeneous, it contains many jobs that exhibit characteristics of precariousness. Moreover, though precariousness is concentrated in non-standard employment, it is by no means confined to non-standard employment. Precariousness also affects parts of standard employment itself. This article is exploratory, aimed at taking up and applying the concept of precariousness to employment in Australia. It discusses the concept of precariousness, emphasising the importance of varied dimensions of labour insecurity. It then outlines the nature, spread and implications of precarious employment in Australia.

Key concepts: Job insecurity, Precarious work, Labour economics, Quality (philosophy), Precarity, Sociology, Political science, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Nature and Dimensions of Precarious Employment in Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens