2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Crashmaker

Chen Bing, Qingkai Zeng, Weiguang Wang

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Concolic testing is a popular method based on symbolic execution and constraint solving, designed for security testing of applications. Unfortunately, the current effectiveness of concolic testing tools are limited when testing large applications due to the enormous number of control paths and limited budget. In this paper, we introduce selective symbolic execution, path selecting, random and incorrect seed input, three approaches to ease the path explosion and speed up bugs exploration. We also develop Crashmaker, a dynamic symbolic execution tool based on Valgrind and constraints solver STP, implementing our three improvement measures. To check the effectiveness and efficiency of Crashmaker, we make experiments with 7 different real-life programs, and compare with Avalanche. The evaluation results show that Crashmaker can effectively find more bugs in a more efficient way.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Concolic testing is a popular method based on symbolic execution and constraint solving, designed for security testing of applications. Unfortunately, the current effectiveness of concolic testing tools are limited when testing large applications due to the enormous number of control paths and limited budget. In this paper, we introduce selective symbolic execution, path selecting, random and incorrect seed input, three approaches to ease the path explosion and speed up bugs exploration. We also develop Crashmaker, a dynamic symbolic execution tool based on Valgrind and constraints solver STP, implementing our three improvement measures. To check the effectiveness and efficiency of Crashmaker, we make experiments with 7 different real-life programs, and compare with Avalanche. The evaluation results show that Crashmaker can effectively find more bugs in a more efficient way.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Concolic testing is a popular method based on symbolic execution and constraint solving, designed for security testing of applications. Unfortunately, the current effectiveness of concolic testing tools are limited when testing large applications due to the enormous number of control paths and limited budget. In this paper, we introduce selective symbolic execution, path selecting, random and incorrect seed input, three approaches to ease the path explosion and speed up bugs exploration. We also develop Crashmaker, a dynamic symbolic execution tool based on Valgrind and constraints solver STP, implementing our three improvement measures. To check the effectiveness and efficiency of Crashmaker, we make experiments with 7 different real-life programs, and compare with Avalanche. The evaluation results show that Crashmaker can effectively find more bugs in a more efficient way.

Key concepts: Concolic testing, Symbolic execution, Computer science, Random testing, Satisfiability modulo theories, Solver, Path (computing), Fuzz testing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crashmaker — Research Paper | ScholarLens