“I Got to Try to Give Back”: How Reciprocity Norms in a Poor People’s Organization Influence Members’ Social Capital
Joan Maya Mazelis
Abstract
Joan Maya Mazelis
Abstract
Norms of reciprocity partially govern social support behavior, particularly in the context of an organization requiring participation in an exchange network. This article focuses on ethnographic interviews with 25 members of the Kensington Welfare Rights Union (KWRU). The social capital KWRU offers members helps them survive, but members can find reciprocity obligations onerous. Reciprocity fosters social capital for those who fulfill norms of reciprocity and hinders social capital for those who violate them. Reciprocity provides an avenue for involved members to build social capital crucial to survival, while it becomes a burden too great for some members to bear.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Norms of reciprocity partially govern social support behavior, particularly in the context of an organization requiring participation in an exchange network. This article focuses on ethnographic interviews with 25 members of the Kensington Welfare Rights Union (KWRU). The social capital KWRU offers members helps them survive, but members can find reciprocity obligations onerous. Reciprocity fosters social capital for those who fulfill norms of reciprocity and hinders social capital for those who violate them. Reciprocity provides an avenue for involved members to build social capital crucial to survival, while it becomes a burden too great for some members to bear.
Key concepts: Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Social capital, Norm of reciprocity, Sociology, Welfare, Social reproduction, Context (archaeology), Social psychology