2011•Journal of the American Oil Chemists SocietyRequires access

Bidirectional Conversion Between 3‐Monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol and Glycidol in Course of the Procedure of DGF Standard Methods

Naoki Kaze, Hirofumi Sato, Hiroshi M Yamamoto, Yomi Watanabe

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

Abstract NMR observation revealed that bidirectional conversion occurred between 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) and glycidol in the course of the analytical procedure of DFG standard method C‐III 18 (09), option A; 3‐MCPD was partly converted to glycidol at the transesterification step, and glycidol was converted partly to 3‐MCPD at the derivatization step conducted at 80 °C under acidic condition in the presence of NaCl. Based on the proton numbers observed by 1H NMR, the degrees of the conversion were estimated to be 37 and >70%, respectively. In addition, epoxide ring‐opening of glycidol and its esters was found to be ca. 90% by the acid treatment described in the method, option B. Thus, it was concluded that the standard method, option A, did not correctly give the combined amount of 3‐MCPD esters and glycidyl esters in oils containing glycidyl esters, and the difference of the values obtained by options A and B did not correspond to the amount of glycidyl esters, either. In addition, derivatives of 3‐MCPD with phenylboronic acid were not observed by NMR at the derivatization step, although they were detected by GC‐MS in the organic phase at the following extraction step.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract NMR observation revealed that bidirectional conversion occurred between 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) and glycidol in the course of the analytical procedure of DFG standard method C‐III 18 (09), option A; 3‐MCPD was partly converted to glycidol at the transesterification step, and glycidol was converted partly to 3‐MCPD at the derivatization step conducted at 80 °C under acidic condition in the presence of NaCl. Based on the proton numbers observed by 1H NMR, the degrees of the conversion were estimated to be 37 and >70%, respectively. In addition, epoxide ring‐opening of glycidol and its esters was found to be ca. 90% by the acid treatment described in the method, option B. Thus, it was concluded that the standard method, option A, did not correctly give the combined amount of 3‐MCPD esters and glycidyl esters in oils containing glycidyl esters, and the difference of the values obtained by options A and B did not correspond to the amount of glycidyl esters, either. In addition, derivatives of 3‐MCPD with phenylboronic acid were not observed by NMR at the derivatization step, although they were detected by GC‐MS in the organic phase at the following extraction step.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract NMR observation revealed that bidirectional conversion occurred between 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) and glycidol in the course of the analytical procedure of DFG standard method C‐III 18 (09), option A; 3‐MCPD was partly converted to glycidol at the transesterification step, and glycidol was converted partly to 3‐MCPD at the derivatization step conducted at 80 °C under acidic condition in the presence of NaCl. Based on the proton numbers observed by 1H NMR, the degrees of the conversion were estimated to be 37 and >70%, respectively. In addition, epoxide ring‐opening of glycidol and its esters was found to be ca. 90% by the acid treatment described in the method, option B. Thus, it was concluded that the standard method, option A, did not correctly give the combined amount of 3‐MCPD esters and glycidyl esters in oils containing glycidyl esters, and the difference of the values obtained by options A and B did not correspond to the amount of glycidyl esters, either. In addition, derivatives of 3‐MCPD with phenylboronic acid were not observed by NMR at the derivatization step, although they were detected by GC‐MS in the organic phase at the following extraction step.

Key concepts: Glycidol, Derivatization, Chemistry, Phenylboronic acid, Epoxide, Chromatography, Propanediol, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bidirectional Conversion Between 3‐Monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol and Glycidol in Course of the Procedure of DGF Standard Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens