1978•Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyRequires access

A new look at the ω‐equation

Brian John Hoskins, I. Draghici, Huw C. Davies

Open publisher page 553 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the conventional quasi‐geostrophic form of the ‘omega’‐equation, the forcing of vertical velocity is usually expressed as the sum of two terms associated respectively with vorticity and temperature advection. Consideration of each term in isolation is misleading and there can be a large degree of cancellation. On the other hand, in Sutcliffe's development theory, this forcing is, in effect, represented by a single term. However, this is achieved at the expense of neglecting another term which is dominant in frontal regions. An investigation, based upon the governing equations, of the manner in which geostrophic balance tends to destroy itself, reveals a simple, concise, one‐term representation of the geostrophic forcing of ageostrophic motion. Many of the traditional synoptic rules are then simple deductions from this theory. An application of the theory in the case of a rapidly developing system is demonstrated using a 700mb chart.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In the conventional quasi‐geostrophic form of the ‘omega’‐equation, the forcing of vertical velocity is usually expressed as the sum of two terms associated respectively with vorticity and temperature advection. Consideration of each term in isolation is misleading and there can be a large degree of cancellation. On the other hand, in Sutcliffe's development theory, this forcing is, in effect, represented by a single term. However, this is achieved at the expense of neglecting another term which is dominant in frontal regions. An investigation, based upon the governing equations, of the manner in which geostrophic balance tends to destroy itself, reveals a simple, concise, one‐term representation of the geostrophic forcing of ageostrophic motion. Many of the traditional synoptic rules are then simple deductions from this theory. An application of the theory in the case of a rapidly developing system is demonstrated using a 700mb chart.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 553 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In the conventional quasi‐geostrophic form of the ‘omega’‐equation, the forcing of vertical velocity is usually expressed as the sum of two terms associated respectively with vorticity and temperature advection. Consideration of each term in isolation is misleading and there can be a large degree of cancellation. On the other hand, in Sutcliffe's development theory, this forcing is, in effect, represented by a single term. However, this is achieved at the expense of neglecting another term which is dominant in frontal regions. An investigation, based upon the governing equations, of the manner in which geostrophic balance tends to destroy itself, reveals a simple, concise, one‐term representation of the geostrophic forcing of ageostrophic motion. Many of the traditional synoptic rules are then simple deductions from this theory. An application of the theory in the case of a rapidly developing system is demonstrated using a 700mb chart.

Key concepts: Forcing (mathematics), Geostrophic wind, Advection, Term (time), Simple (philosophy), Representation (politics), Mathematics, Vorticity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A new look at the ω‐equation — Research Paper | ScholarLens