2006ELT JournalRequires access

Cambridge Grammar of English

Mary Swan

Open publisher page 579 citations

Abstract

The Cambridge Grammar of English, CGE, is not to be confused with the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, CGEL, which in turn is not to be confused with Longman's Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, also CGEL, with their older Grammar of Contemporary English, GCE, or indeed with their Communicative Grammar of English, another CGE. (Why do publishers do this?) Unlike the other four, the new CGE has an explicitly pedagogic slant. In just under 1,000 pages, it provides advanced students and their teachers with comprehensive but accessible coverage of British English grammar, drawing on both the Cambridge International Corpus and the CANCODE spoken corpus, and devoting considerable attention to those areas where speech and writing go their separate ways. Intelligently innovative in its arrangement, it has numerous excellent features. Pedagogic grammars present special organizational problems, since users require different kinds of information which cannot easily be presented effectively within one kind of framework. A grammar of English must of course provide a systematic, logically structured account of the morphological and syntactic categories of the language and of their various meanings and functions. However, certain categories of meaning—for instance time or modality—cut across structural divisions in complicated ways. Reconciling these two perspectives while doing justice to both is not straightforward. A pedagogic grammar also needs to accommodate small-scale reference use, since users often simply need a detached bite-sized account of one problematic topic (‘What's the difference between “mustn't” and “needn't?”’). In the case of CGE, further complexities are introduced by its deliberate foregrounding of areas where speech and writing differ importantly in their grammar.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Cambridge Grammar of English, CGE, is not to be confused with the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, CGEL, which in turn is not to be confused with Longman's Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, also CGEL, with their older Grammar of Contemporary English, GCE, or indeed with their Communicative Grammar of English, another CGE. (Why do publishers do this?) Unlike the other four, the new CGE has an explicitly pedagogic slant. In just under 1,000 pages, it provides advanced students and their teachers with comprehensive but accessible coverage of British English grammar, drawing on both the Cambridge International Corpus and the CANCODE spoken corpus, and devoting considerable attention to those areas where speech and writing go their separate ways. Intelligently innovative in its arrangement, it has numerous excellent features. Pedagogic grammars present special organizational problems, since users require different kinds of information which cannot easily be presented effectively within one kind of framework. A grammar of English must of course provide a systematic, logically structured account of the morphological and syntactic categories of the language and of their various meanings and functions. However, certain categories of meaning—for instance time or modality—cut across structural divisions in complicated ways. Reconciling these two perspectives while doing justice to both is not straightforward. A pedagogic grammar also needs to accommodate small-scale reference use, since users often simply need a detached bite-sized account of one problematic topic (‘What's the difference between “mustn't” and “needn't?”’). In the case of CGE, further complexities are introduced by its deliberate foregrounding of areas where speech and writing differ importantly in their grammar.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 579 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Cambridge Grammar of English, CGE, is not to be confused with the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, CGEL, which in turn is not to be confused with Longman's Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, also CGEL, with their older Grammar of Contemporary English, GCE, or indeed with their Communicative Grammar of English, another CGE. (Why do publishers do this?) Unlike the other four, the new CGE has an explicitly pedagogic slant. In just under 1,000 pages, it provides advanced students and their teachers with comprehensive but accessible coverage of British English grammar, drawing on both the Cambridge International Corpus and the CANCODE spoken corpus, and devoting considerable attention to those areas where speech and writing go their separate ways. Intelligently innovative in its arrangement, it has numerous excellent features. Pedagogic grammars present special organizational problems, since users require different kinds of information which cannot easily be presented effectively within one kind of framework. A grammar of English must of course provide a systematic, logically structured account of the morphological and syntactic categories of the language and of their various meanings and functions. However, certain categories of meaning—for instance time or modality—cut across structural divisions in complicated ways. Reconciling these two perspectives while doing justice to both is not straightforward. A pedagogic grammar also needs to accommodate small-scale reference use, since users often simply need a detached bite-sized account of one problematic topic (‘What's the difference between “mustn't” and “needn't?”’). In the case of CGE, further complexities are introduced by its deliberate foregrounding of areas where speech and writing differ importantly in their grammar.

Key concepts: Grammar, Linguistics, English grammar, Traditional grammar, Computer science, Meaning (existential), Head-driven phrase structure grammar, Rule-based machine translation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cambridge Grammar of English — Research Paper | ScholarLens