Comparison Of Techniques For Measuring The Roughness Of Optical Surfaces
Jean M. Bennett
Abstract
Jean M. Bennett
Abstract
Instrumental techniques available for measuring the roughness of optical surfaces include mechanical profilometers and optical heterodyne profilometers, both of which yield surface profiles, and total integrated and angle-resolved scattering, from which roughness values can be derived using appropriate theoretical relations. These methods are used to measure the roughness of a set of roughness standards made by polishing ground Zerodur surfaces for progressively longer times. The measured roughnesses are compared, and the reasons for the differences are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Instrumental techniques available for measuring the roughness of optical surfaces include mechanical profilometers and optical heterodyne profilometers, both of which yield surface profiles, and total integrated and angle-resolved scattering, from which roughness values can be derived using appropriate theoretical relations. These methods are used to measure the roughness of a set of roughness standards made by polishing ground Zerodur surfaces for progressively longer times. The measured roughnesses are compared, and the reasons for the differences are discussed.
Key concepts: Profilometer, Polishing, Optics, Surface finish, Surface roughness, Materials science, Scattering, Light scattering