Comparison of Two-Way Two-Dimensional Finite Automata and Three-Way Two-Dimensional Finite Automata
Jing Dong, Wenbing Jin
Abstract
Jing Dong, Wenbing Jin
Abstract
Three types of two-way two-dimensional finite automata and three-way two-dimensional finite automata are studied, including deterministic, nondeterministic and Las Vegas finite automata. By comparing the languages recognized by above automata, two results are obtained: (1) The power of two-way two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata and three-way two-dimensional deterministic finite automata cannot be compared, (2) The power of two-way two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata and three-way two-dimensional Las Vegas finite automata cannot be compared.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Three types of two-way two-dimensional finite automata and three-way two-dimensional finite automata are studied, including deterministic, nondeterministic and Las Vegas finite automata. By comparing the languages recognized by above automata, two results are obtained: (1) The power of two-way two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata and three-way two-dimensional deterministic finite automata cannot be compared, (2) The power of two-way two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata and three-way two-dimensional Las Vegas finite automata cannot be compared.
Key concepts: Nondeterministic finite automaton, Quantum finite automata, Deterministic finite automaton, ω-automaton, DFA minimization, Nondeterministic algorithm, Automata theory, Las vegas