1998•AllergyRequires access

Delayed‐type hypersensitivity to a nonionic, radiopaque contrast medium

S. Courvoisier, Andreas J. Bircher

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: True allergic reactions to iodinated radiocontrast media are rare, and only a few well-documented cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions caused by contrast media have been described. METHODS: We report a 61-year-old patient in whom percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed with iopamidol, a nonionic contrast medium. Seven days later, the patient developed generalized maculopapular exanthema. Repeated patch tests with several iodinated agents were performed. RESULTS: A first patch test with iopamidol was positive. Repetition of the patch tests showed positive results to iopamidol as well as to iohexol and ioversol, two other nonionic contrast media, but not to other iodinated substances. Three months later, PTCA was repeated, and iopamidol was used again. Despite premedication, pruritic macular exanthema developed 1 day later. Whether iopamidol or trometamol -- an additive substance in the contrast medium -- was causative could not be determined, since a third set of patch tests was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media are rare. We recommend that patients with delayed exanthematous reactions undergo patch or intradermal tests with different contrast media and their additives, and that readings be performed immediately and later at days 2 and 3.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: True allergic reactions to iodinated radiocontrast media are rare, and only a few well-documented cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions caused by contrast media have been described. METHODS: We report a 61-year-old patient in whom percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed with iopamidol, a nonionic contrast medium. Seven days later, the patient developed generalized maculopapular exanthema. Repeated patch tests with several iodinated agents were performed. RESULTS: A first patch test with iopamidol was positive. Repetition of the patch tests showed positive results to iopamidol as well as to iohexol and ioversol, two other nonionic contrast media, but not to other iodinated substances. Three months later, PTCA was repeated, and iopamidol was used again. Despite premedication, pruritic macular exanthema developed 1 day later. Whether iopamidol or trometamol -- an additive substance in the contrast medium -- was causative could not be determined, since a third set of patch tests was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media are rare. We recommend that patients with delayed exanthematous reactions undergo patch or intradermal tests with different contrast media and their additives, and that readings be performed immediately and later at days 2 and 3.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: True allergic reactions to iodinated radiocontrast media are rare, and only a few well-documented cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions caused by contrast media have been described. METHODS: We report a 61-year-old patient in whom percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed with iopamidol, a nonionic contrast medium. Seven days later, the patient developed generalized maculopapular exanthema. Repeated patch tests with several iodinated agents were performed. RESULTS: A first patch test with iopamidol was positive. Repetition of the patch tests showed positive results to iopamidol as well as to iohexol and ioversol, two other nonionic contrast media, but not to other iodinated substances. Three months later, PTCA was repeated, and iopamidol was used again. Despite premedication, pruritic macular exanthema developed 1 day later. Whether iopamidol or trometamol -- an additive substance in the contrast medium -- was causative could not be determined, since a third set of patch tests was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media are rare. We recommend that patients with delayed exanthematous reactions undergo patch or intradermal tests with different contrast media and their additives, and that readings be performed immediately and later at days 2 and 3.

Key concepts: Iopamidol, Medicine, Iohexol, Iodinated contrast, Iodinated contrast media, Hypersensitivity reaction, Contrast medium, Patch test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Delayed‐type hypersensitivity to a nonionic, radiopaque contrast medium — Research Paper | ScholarLens