1994Archives of SurgeryRequires access

The Success of Duplex Ultrasonographic Scanning in the Diagnosis of Extremity Vascular Proximity Trauma

Fred A. Weaver

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

I read with great interest the article by Fry et al 1 in the December 1993 issue of theArchives.The report concerns a cohort of 200 patients with 225 extremity injuries, only 50 of whom underwent confirmatory operative exploration or arteriography. The authors detail remarkably good results with duplex scanning for the diagnosis of significant vascular injury: 100% sensitivity, 97.3% specificity, and an overall accuracy of 98.5%. Although I wholeheartedly agree that duplex scanning may potentially have an invaluable role in the diagnosis of vascular injuries, a few cautionary provisos are in order. In a small pilot study recently published, Schwartz et al 2 found that duplex ultrasonography was capable of diagnosing an arterial injury in 58% of the cases and that it was very technically dependent. This provides a note of caution with regard to the widespread application of duplex scanning. The technical expertise required to adequately examine an

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I read with great interest the article by Fry et al 1 in the December 1993 issue of theArchives.The report concerns a cohort of 200 patients with 225 extremity injuries, only 50 of whom underwent confirmatory operative exploration or arteriography. The authors detail remarkably good results with duplex scanning for the diagnosis of significant vascular injury: 100% sensitivity, 97.3% specificity, and an overall accuracy of 98.5%. Although I wholeheartedly agree that duplex scanning may potentially have an invaluable role in the diagnosis of vascular injuries, a few cautionary provisos are in order. In a small pilot study recently published, Schwartz et al 2 found that duplex ultrasonography was capable of diagnosing an arterial injury in 58% of the cases and that it was very technically dependent. This provides a note of caution with regard to the widespread application of duplex scanning. The technical expertise required to adequately examine an

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I read with great interest the article by Fry et al 1 in the December 1993 issue of theArchives.The report concerns a cohort of 200 patients with 225 extremity injuries, only 50 of whom underwent confirmatory operative exploration or arteriography. The authors detail remarkably good results with duplex scanning for the diagnosis of significant vascular injury: 100% sensitivity, 97.3% specificity, and an overall accuracy of 98.5%. Although I wholeheartedly agree that duplex scanning may potentially have an invaluable role in the diagnosis of vascular injuries, a few cautionary provisos are in order. In a small pilot study recently published, Schwartz et al 2 found that duplex ultrasonography was capable of diagnosing an arterial injury in 58% of the cases and that it was very technically dependent. This provides a note of caution with regard to the widespread application of duplex scanning. The technical expertise required to adequately examine an

Key concepts: Medicine, Duplex scanning, Duplex (building), Ultrasonography, Radiology, Duplex ultrasonography, Surgery, DNA

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Success of Duplex Ultrasonographic Scanning in the Diagnosis of Extremity Vascular Proximity Trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens