1979Geomicrobiology JournalRequires access

Microbiological fractionation of stable sulfur isotopes: A review and critique

L. A. Chambers, P. A. Trudinger

Open publisher page 448 citations

Abstract

Microbiological transformations of sulfur compounds discriminate to various degrees between the stable sulfur isotopes 32S and 34S. Comparatively little is known on isotopic effects associated with sulfur‐oxidizing organisms, and the interpretation of results is complicated since the sulfur pathways are poorly defined and compounds containing two or more sulfur atoms at different oxidation states may be involved. Dissimilatory reduction of sulfate, and sulfite reduction by certain assimilatory microorganisms, causes particularly marked isotopic effects, the expression of which depends on the extent of reaction and other incompletely defined environmental conditions. Models have been proposed to account for these effects based on current knowledge of the reduction pathways. Many of the trends observed during dissimilatory sulfate reduction in the laboratory can also be found in the modern environment leaving little doubt that microbiological factors play a significant role in determining sulfur isotope distributions in nature. However, unusually large isotopic effects, rarely approached in the laboratory, are often observed in nature. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but in sediments it is possible that diffusional isotopic effects are imposed on biological effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Microbiological transformations of sulfur compounds discriminate to various degrees between the stable sulfur isotopes 32S and 34S. Comparatively little is known on isotopic effects associated with sulfur‐oxidizing organisms, and the interpretation of results is complicated since the sulfur pathways are poorly defined and compounds containing two or more sulfur atoms at different oxidation states may be involved. Dissimilatory reduction of sulfate, and sulfite reduction by certain assimilatory microorganisms, causes particularly marked isotopic effects, the expression of which depends on the extent of reaction and other incompletely defined environmental conditions. Models have been proposed to account for these effects based on current knowledge of the reduction pathways. Many of the trends observed during dissimilatory sulfate reduction in the laboratory can also be found in the modern environment leaving little doubt that microbiological factors play a significant role in determining sulfur isotope distributions in nature. However, unusually large isotopic effects, rarely approached in the laboratory, are often observed in nature. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but in sediments it is possible that diffusional isotopic effects are imposed on biological effects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 448 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Microbiological transformations of sulfur compounds discriminate to various degrees between the stable sulfur isotopes 32S and 34S. Comparatively little is known on isotopic effects associated with sulfur‐oxidizing organisms, and the interpretation of results is complicated since the sulfur pathways are poorly defined and compounds containing two or more sulfur atoms at different oxidation states may be involved. Dissimilatory reduction of sulfate, and sulfite reduction by certain assimilatory microorganisms, causes particularly marked isotopic effects, the expression of which depends on the extent of reaction and other incompletely defined environmental conditions. Models have been proposed to account for these effects based on current knowledge of the reduction pathways. Many of the trends observed during dissimilatory sulfate reduction in the laboratory can also be found in the modern environment leaving little doubt that microbiological factors play a significant role in determining sulfur isotope distributions in nature. However, unusually large isotopic effects, rarely approached in the laboratory, are often observed in nature. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but in sediments it is possible that diffusional isotopic effects are imposed on biological effects.

Key concepts: Sulfur, Isotopes of sulfur, Sulfate, Sulfur cycle, Chemistry, Environmental chemistry, Isotope, Sulfite

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microbiological fractionation of stable sulfur isotopes: A review and critique — Research Paper | ScholarLens