1989•Archives of OphthalmologyRequires access

Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy

Peter N. Arrowsmith

Open publisher page 139 citations

Abstract

Ongoing prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy was conducted on 156 eyes of the first 101 consecutive patients. We did a one-year follow-up and compared previously reported six-month findings. All eyes were examined both six months and one year after surgery. Findings obtained by an independent examiner both before and after surgery correlated highly with findings obtained in the surgeon's office. One year after surgery, mean change in spherical equivalent was +4.7 diopters; overall uncorrected distance acuity was 20/20 in 49% of cases and at least 20/40 in 76% of cases. Fifty-eight percent of eyes were within 1.0 D of emmetropia. Visual results showed slight general improvement between six and 12 months; refractive results were stable, except that excessive overcorrection was found to decrease. In this series, radial keratotomy seemed safe and effective one year after surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ongoing prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy was conducted on 156 eyes of the first 101 consecutive patients. We did a one-year follow-up and compared previously reported six-month findings. All eyes were examined both six months and one year after surgery. Findings obtained by an independent examiner both before and after surgery correlated highly with findings obtained in the surgeon's office. One year after surgery, mean change in spherical equivalent was +4.7 diopters; overall uncorrected distance acuity was 20/20 in 49% of cases and at least 20/40 in 76% of cases. Fifty-eight percent of eyes were within 1.0 D of emmetropia. Visual results showed slight general improvement between six and 12 months; refractive results were stable, except that excessive overcorrection was found to decrease. In this series, radial keratotomy seemed safe and effective one year after surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 139 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ongoing prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy was conducted on 156 eyes of the first 101 consecutive patients. We did a one-year follow-up and compared previously reported six-month findings. All eyes were examined both six months and one year after surgery. Findings obtained by an independent examiner both before and after surgery correlated highly with findings obtained in the surgeon's office. One year after surgery, mean change in spherical equivalent was +4.7 diopters; overall uncorrected distance acuity was 20/20 in 49% of cases and at least 20/40 in 76% of cases. Fifty-eight percent of eyes were within 1.0 D of emmetropia. Visual results showed slight general improvement between six and 12 months; refractive results were stable, except that excessive overcorrection was found to decrease. In this series, radial keratotomy seemed safe and effective one year after surgery.

Key concepts: Emmetropia, Radial keratotomy, Dioptre, Visual acuity, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Refractive error

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Visual, Refractive, and Keratometric Results of Radial Keratotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens