1967New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

Power of the Package Insert

Neil L. Chayet

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

THE precursor of the current storm surrounding the heretofore innocuous package insert was a malpractice case against a New York dentist in which the insert in a package of epinephrine with lidocaine (Xylocaine) became the plaintiff's chief weapon against the dentist who had administered the drug to a hypertensive woman. The patient died shortly after the drug was administered, and her estate, which brought the lawsuit, was unable to obtain expert medical testimony to prove that the dentist had been negligent in administering the drug. A jury was allowed to find against the dentist, however, on the ground that the . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

THE precursor of the current storm surrounding the heretofore innocuous package insert was a malpractice case against a New York dentist in which the insert in a package of epinephrine with lidocaine (Xylocaine) became the plaintiff's chief weapon against the dentist who had administered the drug to a hypertensive woman. The patient died shortly after the drug was administered, and her estate, which brought the lawsuit, was unable to obtain expert medical testimony to prove that the dentist had been negligent in administering the drug. A jury was allowed to find against the dentist, however, on the ground that the . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

THE precursor of the current storm surrounding the heretofore innocuous package insert was a malpractice case against a New York dentist in which the insert in a package of epinephrine with lidocaine (Xylocaine) became the plaintiff's chief weapon against the dentist who had administered the drug to a hypertensive woman. The patient died shortly after the drug was administered, and her estate, which brought the lawsuit, was unable to obtain expert medical testimony to prove that the dentist had been negligent in administering the drug. A jury was allowed to find against the dentist, however, on the ground that the . . .

Key concepts: Medicine, Package insert, Jury, Lawsuit, Malpractice, Plaintiff, Lidocaine, Insert (composites)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Power of the Package Insert — Research Paper | ScholarLens