ScholarLens Back to search
2005•International Criminal Law ReviewRequires access

Current Developments in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Gregory Townsend

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

1 International Prosecutor, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK); former Assistant Trial Attorney, Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). LLD candidate, University of South Africa; JD, Loyola Law School; DES, Institut Universitaire des Hautes Études Internationales; MALD, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; BA, UCLA. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not attributable to UNMIK, OTP, ICTR, or the United Nations. 2 Hereinafter referred to as the “ICTR” or the “Tribunal”. 3 Prosecutor v . Ntakirutimana & Ntakirutimana , Judgement and Sentence, No. ICTR-96-10 & ICTR-96-17-T (21 February 2003)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1 International Prosecutor, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK); former Assistant Trial Attorney, Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). LLD candidate, University of South Africa; JD, Loyola Law School; DES, Institut Universitaire des Hautes Études Internationales; MALD, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; BA, UCLA. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not attributable to UNMIK, OTP, ICTR, or the United Nations. 2 Hereinafter referred to as the “ICTR” or the “Tribunal”. 3 Prosecutor v . Ntakirutimana & Ntakirutimana , Judgement and Sentence, No. ICTR-96-10 & ICTR-96-17-T (21 February 2003)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1 International Prosecutor, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK); former Assistant Trial Attorney, Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). LLD candidate, University of South Africa; JD, Loyola Law School; DES, Institut Universitaire des Hautes Études Internationales; MALD, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; BA, UCLA. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not attributable to UNMIK, OTP, ICTR, or the United Nations. 2 Hereinafter referred to as the “ICTR” or the “Tribunal”. 3 Prosecutor v . Ntakirutimana & Ntakirutimana , Judgement and Sentence, No. ICTR-96-10 & ICTR-96-17-T (21 February 2003)

Key concepts: Tribunal, Law, Jurisprudence, Political science, Interim, Judgement, Diplomacy, Politics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Current Developments in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda — Research Paper | ScholarLens