2008•DMW - Deutsche Medizinische WochenschriftRequires access

Therapie des Ulcus ventriculi mit Sucralfat und Ranitidin: Eine multizentrische Doppelblindstudie

A.L. Blum, J. Ch. Bode, Wolfram Domschke, Gerhard E. Feurle, Katharina A. M. Hackenberg, Bruce E. Hammer, W Hüttemann, G Kachel, Herbert Kaess, B. C. Manegold, Paul Peter, Theodor Pfleiderer, H. G. Rohner, Udo Rasenack, R. Sanwald, Georg A. Stalder, J.-J. Vallotton

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

134 outpatients with acute benign gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy received either 1 g sucralfate suspension four times daily or one 150 mg ranitidine tablet twice daily for six to 12 weeks in a multicentre therapy study (double-blind study according to the double-dummy technique). After six to 12 weeks, respectively, 56% and 82% of the ulcers had healed in the sucralfate group. The rates of healing in the ranitidine group were 72% and 88%, respectively. The differences in the rates of healing between sucralfate and ranitidine were not statistically significant. Ranitidine was superior to the sucralfate suspension in corpus ulcer. In the distally located ulcers, the two kinds of treatment were equivalent. There were no appreciable differences between the medications with regard to antacid consumption and compliance. Gastric pain was influenced better by ranitidine than by sucralfate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

134 outpatients with acute benign gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy received either 1 g sucralfate suspension four times daily or one 150 mg ranitidine tablet twice daily for six to 12 weeks in a multicentre therapy study (double-blind study according to the double-dummy technique). After six to 12 weeks, respectively, 56% and 82% of the ulcers had healed in the sucralfate group. The rates of healing in the ranitidine group were 72% and 88%, respectively. The differences in the rates of healing between sucralfate and ranitidine were not statistically significant. Ranitidine was superior to the sucralfate suspension in corpus ulcer. In the distally located ulcers, the two kinds of treatment were equivalent. There were no appreciable differences between the medications with regard to antacid consumption and compliance. Gastric pain was influenced better by ranitidine than by sucralfate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

134 outpatients with acute benign gastric ulcer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy received either 1 g sucralfate suspension four times daily or one 150 mg ranitidine tablet twice daily for six to 12 weeks in a multicentre therapy study (double-blind study according to the double-dummy technique). After six to 12 weeks, respectively, 56% and 82% of the ulcers had healed in the sucralfate group. The rates of healing in the ranitidine group were 72% and 88%, respectively. The differences in the rates of healing between sucralfate and ranitidine were not statistically significant. Ranitidine was superior to the sucralfate suspension in corpus ulcer. In the distally located ulcers, the two kinds of treatment were equivalent. There were no appreciable differences between the medications with regard to antacid consumption and compliance. Gastric pain was influenced better by ranitidine than by sucralfate.

Key concepts: Sucralfate, Ranitidine, Antacid, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Therapie des Ulcus ventriculi mit Sucralfat und Ranitidin: Eine multizentrische Doppelblindstudie — Research Paper | ScholarLens