2014•Journal of Performance of Constructed FacilitiesOpen access

Progressive Collapse Resistance of Two Typical High-Rise RC Frame Shear Wall Structures

Peiqi Ren, Yi Li, Hong Guan, Xinzheng Lu

Open full text 48 citations

Abstract

Existing research on progressive collapse of building structures mainly focuses on concrete and steel frame structures. To investigate the progressive collapse resistance of high-rise RC frame shear wall structures, two typical 15-story building models are designed with equivalent overall lateral resistance to seismic actions. However, the structural layouts in resisting the lateral forces are quite different for the two buildings. Building A is a weak wall-strong frame structure, whereas building B is a strong wall-weak frame system. Three-dimensional (3D) finite-element models of the two structures are established using fiber beam and multilayer shell elements. The progressive collapse resistances of the frames and the shear walls in both structures are evaluated under various column (shear wall) removal scenarios. Results demonstrate that there is a difference in progressive collapse prevention performance for different structural layouts. The progressive collapse resistance tends to be inadequate for the strong wall-weak frame system. Such a system is subsequently redesigned using the linear static alternate path (AP) method proposed in GSA guideline, through which the reliability and efficiency of the method are confirmed. The outcome of this study has provided a reference for progressive collapse prevention designs of typical and representative high-rise RC frame shear wall structures.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Existing research on progressive collapse of building structures mainly focuses on concrete and steel frame structures. To investigate the progressive collapse resistance of high-rise RC frame shear wall structures, two typical 15-story building models are designed with equivalent overall lateral resistance to seismic actions. However, the structural layouts in resisting the lateral forces are quite different for the two buildings. Building A is a weak wall-strong frame structure, whereas building B is a strong wall-weak frame system. Three-dimensional (3D) finite-element models of the two structures are established using fiber beam and multilayer shell elements. The progressive collapse resistances of the frames and the shear walls in both structures are evaluated under various column (shear wall) removal scenarios. Results demonstrate that there is a difference in progressive collapse prevention performance for different structural layouts. The progressive collapse resistance tends to be inadequate for the strong wall-weak frame system. Such a system is subsequently redesigned using the linear static alternate path (AP) method proposed in GSA guideline, through which the reliability and efficiency of the method are confirmed. The outcome of this study has provided a reference for progressive collapse prevention designs of typical and representative high-rise RC frame shear wall structures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Existing research on progressive collapse of building structures mainly focuses on concrete and steel frame structures. To investigate the progressive collapse resistance of high-rise RC frame shear wall structures, two typical 15-story building models are designed with equivalent overall lateral resistance to seismic actions. However, the structural layouts in resisting the lateral forces are quite different for the two buildings. Building A is a weak wall-strong frame structure, whereas building B is a strong wall-weak frame system. Three-dimensional (3D) finite-element models of the two structures are established using fiber beam and multilayer shell elements. The progressive collapse resistances of the frames and the shear walls in both structures are evaluated under various column (shear wall) removal scenarios. Results demonstrate that there is a difference in progressive collapse prevention performance for different structural layouts. The progressive collapse resistance tends to be inadequate for the strong wall-weak frame system. Such a system is subsequently redesigned using the linear static alternate path (AP) method proposed in GSA guideline, through which the reliability and efficiency of the method are confirmed. The outcome of this study has provided a reference for progressive collapse prevention designs of typical and representative high-rise RC frame shear wall structures.

Key concepts: Progressive collapse, Shear wall, Structural engineering, Frame (networking), Structural system, Reinforced concrete, Beam (structure), High rise

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Progressive Collapse Resistance of Two Typical High-Rise RC Frame Shear Wall Structures — Research Paper | ScholarLens