1998PROCEEDINGS OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERINGOpen access

COMPARISON OF DISTRIBUTED AND LUMPED HYDROLOGICAL MODELS

Huaxia Yao, Michio HASHINO, Akira Terakawa, Toshiro Suzuki

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

A physically based distributed model, consisted of grid cell-sub-model of SVAT type and river routing sub-model of linear reservoir type, is proposed. Grid cell-specific meteorological variables are produced by a special regression method and applied to the Fuji River basin divided into 3, 376 grid cells. On the other hand, the basin is regarded as one grid and a lumped model is considered, with its input being the averages of distributed data. Then these two models are compared as for differing situations. They give similarly good runoff process when rainfall on basin is large and relatively uniform. However they behave differently when rainfall is not large and very non-uniform in spatial distribution. The lumped model underestimates flood peak flows. And the distributed model is applied to analysis of hydrological response to possible landuse change, while it is difficult to do so with the lumped model. Conclusively distributed model could be more appropriate than lumped model for a large basin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A physically based distributed model, consisted of grid cell-sub-model of SVAT type and river routing sub-model of linear reservoir type, is proposed. Grid cell-specific meteorological variables are produced by a special regression method and applied to the Fuji River basin divided into 3, 376 grid cells. On the other hand, the basin is regarded as one grid and a lumped model is considered, with its input being the averages of distributed data. Then these two models are compared as for differing situations. They give similarly good runoff process when rainfall on basin is large and relatively uniform. However they behave differently when rainfall is not large and very non-uniform in spatial distribution. The lumped model underestimates flood peak flows. And the distributed model is applied to analysis of hydrological response to possible landuse change, while it is difficult to do so with the lumped model. Conclusively distributed model could be more appropriate than lumped model for a large basin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A physically based distributed model, consisted of grid cell-sub-model of SVAT type and river routing sub-model of linear reservoir type, is proposed. Grid cell-specific meteorological variables are produced by a special regression method and applied to the Fuji River basin divided into 3, 376 grid cells. On the other hand, the basin is regarded as one grid and a lumped model is considered, with its input being the averages of distributed data. Then these two models are compared as for differing situations. They give similarly good runoff process when rainfall on basin is large and relatively uniform. However they behave differently when rainfall is not large and very non-uniform in spatial distribution. The lumped model underestimates flood peak flows. And the distributed model is applied to analysis of hydrological response to possible landuse change, while it is difficult to do so with the lumped model. Conclusively distributed model could be more appropriate than lumped model for a large basin.

Key concepts: Distributed element model, Grid, Surface runoff, Structural basin, Grid cell, Drainage basin, Hydrological modelling, Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF DISTRIBUTED AND LUMPED HYDROLOGICAL MODELS — Research Paper | ScholarLens