Lateral-Directional Dynamics and Roll Control Power for the Landing Approach
G. Hall, Edward M. Boothe
Abstract
G. Hall, Edward M. Boothe
Abstract
Lateral-directional handling qualities and roll control power requirements for executive jet and military Class II Airplanes in the landing approach flight phase were investigated in the USAF/CAL variable stability T-33 airplane. Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of crosswinds and turbulence. It was found that the ranges of lateral-directional dynamics investigated do not establish a limiting crosswind value. Roll control power requirements were determined from pilot control usage data and an investigation of the effects of limited roll control power. Available roll control power can establish a limiting crosswind component. A detailed comparison with MIL-F-8785B(ASG) requirements generally shows the present requirements to be too conservative in the landing approach phase.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lateral-directional handling qualities and roll control power requirements for executive jet and military Class II Airplanes in the landing approach flight phase were investigated in the USAF/CAL variable stability T-33 airplane. Particular emphasis was placed on the effects of crosswinds and turbulence. It was found that the ranges of lateral-directional dynamics investigated do not establish a limiting crosswind value. Roll control power requirements were determined from pilot control usage data and an investigation of the effects of limited roll control power. Available roll control power can establish a limiting crosswind component. A detailed comparison with MIL-F-8785B(ASG) requirements generally shows the present requirements to be too conservative in the landing approach phase.
Key concepts: Flight control surfaces, Aerospace engineering, Dynamics (music), Power (physics), Flight dynamics, Aileron, Control theory (sociology), Geology