1988The American NaturalistRequires access

Processes of Pair Formation Leading to Assortative Mating in Biological Populations: Encounter-Mating Model

A. Gimelfarb

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

A model dealing with mating as a process of pair formation is considered. The model explicitly postulates two steps in the process: an encounter between individuals available for mating, and the end of the encounter in mating or not mating depending on the individual mating preferences. Two types of encounters, "individual" and "mass" encounters, are introduced, and the restrictions imposed by previously formed pairs on the availability of individuals for future matings are discussed. It is demonstrated that not only the mating preferences of individuals but also the type of encounters between individuals affect the distribution of characters in mating pairs (mating pattern of the population). It is also shown that the mating pattern of a population is not a direct reflection of the individual mating preferences; for example, panmixia does not necessarily mean that individuals do not have mating preferences, and positive (negative) assortment in mating pairs does not necessarily indicate homotypic (heterotypic) mating preferences. The importance of distinguishing between the pattern of mating preferences and the mating pattern of a population is emphasized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A model dealing with mating as a process of pair formation is considered. The model explicitly postulates two steps in the process: an encounter between individuals available for mating, and the end of the encounter in mating or not mating depending on the individual mating preferences. Two types of encounters, "individual" and "mass" encounters, are introduced, and the restrictions imposed by previously formed pairs on the availability of individuals for future matings are discussed. It is demonstrated that not only the mating preferences of individuals but also the type of encounters between individuals affect the distribution of characters in mating pairs (mating pattern of the population). It is also shown that the mating pattern of a population is not a direct reflection of the individual mating preferences; for example, panmixia does not necessarily mean that individuals do not have mating preferences, and positive (negative) assortment in mating pairs does not necessarily indicate homotypic (heterotypic) mating preferences. The importance of distinguishing between the pattern of mating preferences and the mating pattern of a population is emphasized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A model dealing with mating as a process of pair formation is considered. The model explicitly postulates two steps in the process: an encounter between individuals available for mating, and the end of the encounter in mating or not mating depending on the individual mating preferences. Two types of encounters, "individual" and "mass" encounters, are introduced, and the restrictions imposed by previously formed pairs on the availability of individuals for future matings are discussed. It is demonstrated that not only the mating preferences of individuals but also the type of encounters between individuals affect the distribution of characters in mating pairs (mating pattern of the population). It is also shown that the mating pattern of a population is not a direct reflection of the individual mating preferences; for example, panmixia does not necessarily mean that individuals do not have mating preferences, and positive (negative) assortment in mating pairs does not necessarily indicate homotypic (heterotypic) mating preferences. The importance of distinguishing between the pattern of mating preferences and the mating pattern of a population is emphasized.

Key concepts: Mating, Panmixia, Biology, Assortative mating, Population, Evolutionary biology, Ecology, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Processes of Pair Formation Leading to Assortative Mating in Biological Populations: Encounter-Mating Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens