Phenolic contents of submerged, emergent and floating leaves of aquatic and semi‐aquatic macrophyte species: why do they differ?
Alfons J. P. Smolders, L.H.T. Vergeer, G. van der Velde, J. G. M. Roelofs
Abstract
Alfons J. P. Smolders, L.H.T. Vergeer, G. van der Velde, J. G. M. Roelofs
Abstract
The phenolic content of leaves of 40 aquatic and semi‐aquatic plant species, collected from stands distributed over the Netherlands was investigated. Species with submerged leaves showed a significantly lower phenolic content than species with emergent or floating leaves; the latter two showing no significant differences. Possible explanations for the observed differences are discussed in relation to defence strategies.
OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The phenolic content of leaves of 40 aquatic and semi‐aquatic plant species, collected from stands distributed over the Netherlands was investigated. Species with submerged leaves showed a significantly lower phenolic content than species with emergent or floating leaves; the latter two showing no significant differences. Possible explanations for the observed differences are discussed in relation to defence strategies.
Key concepts: Macrophyte, Aquatic plant, Biology, Aquatic ecosystem, Ecology, Botany