1998Development and ChangeRequires access

Transnationalism in the Era of Nation‐States: China, 1900–1945

Prasenjit Duara

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Transnationalism tends to be seen as a late twentieth century development associated with advanced capitalism, flexible production and post‐modernism. However, if, as many claim, nationalism emerged in the era of capitalism, then it surely had to deal with the boundary‐crossing and globalizing impetus of capitalism from its inception. This article explores how nationalist regimes and spokesmen dealt with the transnational flows, demands, and ideals generated not only by capitalism, but by historical forces such as universalizing religions and the distribution and movement of populations across territorial nations. Focusing on East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century, three cases are studied: the convergence of Chinese and Japanese ideals of pan‐Asianism; the Chinese republican regime's effort to incorporate the non‐Chinese peoples of the vast peripheries into the territorial nation‐state; and this regime's efforts to cultivate the loyalty of overseas Chinese to the nation‐state. Mobilizing and deploying these transterritorial phenomena was crucial to the nation‐state's internal power, yet such a mobilization tended to transgress the conception of territorial sovereignty upon which the nation‐state was equally dependent both domestically and internationally. The recent signs of a tendency for the territorially sovereign nation to develop into a deterritorialized nation has consequences that can only be understood in the context of the nation's relationship to transnational forces in this earlier period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transnationalism tends to be seen as a late twentieth century development associated with advanced capitalism, flexible production and post‐modernism. However, if, as many claim, nationalism emerged in the era of capitalism, then it surely had to deal with the boundary‐crossing and globalizing impetus of capitalism from its inception. This article explores how nationalist regimes and spokesmen dealt with the transnational flows, demands, and ideals generated not only by capitalism, but by historical forces such as universalizing religions and the distribution and movement of populations across territorial nations. Focusing on East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century, three cases are studied: the convergence of Chinese and Japanese ideals of pan‐Asianism; the Chinese republican regime's effort to incorporate the non‐Chinese peoples of the vast peripheries into the territorial nation‐state; and this regime's efforts to cultivate the loyalty of overseas Chinese to the nation‐state. Mobilizing and deploying these transterritorial phenomena was crucial to the nation‐state's internal power, yet such a mobilization tended to transgress the conception of territorial sovereignty upon which the nation‐state was equally dependent both domestically and internationally. The recent signs of a tendency for the territorially sovereign nation to develop into a deterritorialized nation has consequences that can only be understood in the context of the nation's relationship to transnational forces in this earlier period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transnationalism tends to be seen as a late twentieth century development associated with advanced capitalism, flexible production and post‐modernism. However, if, as many claim, nationalism emerged in the era of capitalism, then it surely had to deal with the boundary‐crossing and globalizing impetus of capitalism from its inception. This article explores how nationalist regimes and spokesmen dealt with the transnational flows, demands, and ideals generated not only by capitalism, but by historical forces such as universalizing religions and the distribution and movement of populations across territorial nations. Focusing on East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century, three cases are studied: the convergence of Chinese and Japanese ideals of pan‐Asianism; the Chinese republican regime's effort to incorporate the non‐Chinese peoples of the vast peripheries into the territorial nation‐state; and this regime's efforts to cultivate the loyalty of overseas Chinese to the nation‐state. Mobilizing and deploying these transterritorial phenomena was crucial to the nation‐state's internal power, yet such a mobilization tended to transgress the conception of territorial sovereignty upon which the nation‐state was equally dependent both domestically and internationally. The recent signs of a tendency for the territorially sovereign nation to develop into a deterritorialized nation has consequences that can only be understood in the context of the nation's relationship to transnational forces in this earlier period.

Key concepts: Transnationalism, China, Political science, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transnationalism in the Era of Nation‐States: China, 1900–1945 — Research Paper | ScholarLens