1986•PubMedRequires access

The relationship of dental crowding to tooth size, dental arch width, and arch depth.

Heon-Soo Chang, Yu‐Shuan Shiau, K C Chen

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

This study was undertaken to answer the question, "Are there any differences in the mesiodistal tooth diameters, dental arch width and dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded dentitions?" The materials submitted for study consisted of the Orthoscan intraoral occlusograms of 89 subjects with well-aligned dentition and those of 74 subjects with gross dental crowding. The tooth size and arch dimensions were measured from these intraoral occlusograms. The data were subjected to statistical treatment for comparison of noncrowded and crowded groups. The findings in this study lead to the following conclusions: The mesiodistal tooth diameters of the crowded group were significantly larger than those of the noncrowded group. The dental arch widths of the crowded group were significantly smaller than those of the noncrowded group. No substantial or significant difference in dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded subjects could be noted. From these findings it seems that tooth size and dental arch width are determining factors in the formation of dental crowding. Clinically, these results suggest that in the treatment of dental crowding, extraction of teeth and/or expansion of dental arches should be considered depending on what is the main causative factor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was undertaken to answer the question, "Are there any differences in the mesiodistal tooth diameters, dental arch width and dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded dentitions?" The materials submitted for study consisted of the Orthoscan intraoral occlusograms of 89 subjects with well-aligned dentition and those of 74 subjects with gross dental crowding. The tooth size and arch dimensions were measured from these intraoral occlusograms. The data were subjected to statistical treatment for comparison of noncrowded and crowded groups. The findings in this study lead to the following conclusions: The mesiodistal tooth diameters of the crowded group were significantly larger than those of the noncrowded group. The dental arch widths of the crowded group were significantly smaller than those of the noncrowded group. No substantial or significant difference in dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded subjects could be noted. From these findings it seems that tooth size and dental arch width are determining factors in the formation of dental crowding. Clinically, these results suggest that in the treatment of dental crowding, extraction of teeth and/or expansion of dental arches should be considered depending on what is the main causative factor.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was undertaken to answer the question, "Are there any differences in the mesiodistal tooth diameters, dental arch width and dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded dentitions?" The materials submitted for study consisted of the Orthoscan intraoral occlusograms of 89 subjects with well-aligned dentition and those of 74 subjects with gross dental crowding. The tooth size and arch dimensions were measured from these intraoral occlusograms. The data were subjected to statistical treatment for comparison of noncrowded and crowded groups. The findings in this study lead to the following conclusions: The mesiodistal tooth diameters of the crowded group were significantly larger than those of the noncrowded group. The dental arch widths of the crowded group were significantly smaller than those of the noncrowded group. No substantial or significant difference in dental arch depth between the crowded and noncrowded subjects could be noted. From these findings it seems that tooth size and dental arch width are determining factors in the formation of dental crowding. Clinically, these results suggest that in the treatment of dental crowding, extraction of teeth and/or expansion of dental arches should be considered depending on what is the main causative factor.

Key concepts: Arch, Dental arch, Crowding, Dentistry, Dentition, Medicine, Orthodontics, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The relationship of dental crowding to tooth size, dental arch width, and arch depth. — Research Paper | ScholarLens