2009Journal of the ACMRequires access

Polynomial flow-cut gaps and hardness of directed cut problems

Julia Chuzhoy, Sanjeev Khanna

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

We study the multicut and the sparsest cut problems in directed graphs. In the multicut problem, we are a given ann-vertex graphGalong withksource-sink pairs, and the goal is to find the minimum cardinality subset of edges whose removal separates all source-sink pairs. The sparsest cut problem has the same input, but the goal is to find a subset of edges to delete so as to minimize the ratio of the number of deleted edges to the number of source-sink pairs that are separated by this deletion. The natural linear programming relaxation for multicut corresponds, by LP-duality, to the well-studied maximum (fractional) multicommodity flow problem, while the standard LP-relaxation for sparsest cut corresponds to maximum concurrent flow. Therefore, the integrality gap of the linear programming relaxation for multicut/sparsest cut is also theflow-cut gap: the largest gap, achievable for any graph, between the maximum flow value and the minimum cost solution for the corresponding cut problem. Our first result is that the flow-cut gap between maximum multicommodity flow and minimum multicut is Ω˜(n1/7) in directed graphs. We show a similar result for the gap between maximum concurrent flow and sparsest cut in directed graphs. These results improve upon a long-standing lower bound of Ω(logn) for both types of flow-cut gaps. We notice that these polynomially large flow-cut gaps are in a sharp contrast to the undirected setting where both these flow-cut gaps are known to be Θ(logn). Our second result is that both directed multicut and sparsest cut are hard to approximate to within a factor of 2Ω(log1-ϵn)for any constant ϵ > 0, unless NP ⊆ ZPP. This improves upon the recent Ω(logn/log logn)-hardness result for these problems. We also show that existence of PCP's for NP with perfect completeness, polynomially small soundness, and constant number of queries would imply a polynomial factor hardness of approximation for both these problems. All our results hold for directed acyclic graphs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We study the multicut and the sparsest cut problems in directed graphs. In the multicut problem, we are a given ann-vertex graphGalong withksource-sink pairs, and the goal is to find the minimum cardinality subset of edges whose removal separates all source-sink pairs. The sparsest cut problem has the same input, but the goal is to find a subset of edges to delete so as to minimize the ratio of the number of deleted edges to the number of source-sink pairs that are separated by this deletion. The natural linear programming relaxation for multicut corresponds, by LP-duality, to the well-studied maximum (fractional) multicommodity flow problem, while the standard LP-relaxation for sparsest cut corresponds to maximum concurrent flow. Therefore, the integrality gap of the linear programming relaxation for multicut/sparsest cut is also theflow-cut gap: the largest gap, achievable for any graph, between the maximum flow value and the minimum cost solution for the corresponding cut problem. Our first result is that the flow-cut gap between maximum multicommodity flow and minimum multicut is Ω˜(n1/7) in directed graphs. We show a similar result for the gap between maximum concurrent flow and sparsest cut in directed graphs. These results improve upon a long-standing lower bound of Ω(logn) for both types of flow-cut gaps. We notice that these polynomially large flow-cut gaps are in a sharp contrast to the undirected setting where both these flow-cut gaps are known to be Θ(logn). Our second result is that both directed multicut and sparsest cut are hard to approximate to within a factor of 2Ω(log1-ϵn)for any constant ϵ > 0, unless NP ⊆ ZPP. This improves upon the recent Ω(logn/log logn)-hardness result for these problems. We also show that existence of PCP's for NP with perfect completeness, polynomially small soundness, and constant number of queries would imply a polynomial factor hardness of approximation for both these problems. All our results hold for directed acyclic graphs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We study the multicut and the sparsest cut problems in directed graphs. In the multicut problem, we are a given ann-vertex graphGalong withksource-sink pairs, and the goal is to find the minimum cardinality subset of edges whose removal separates all source-sink pairs. The sparsest cut problem has the same input, but the goal is to find a subset of edges to delete so as to minimize the ratio of the number of deleted edges to the number of source-sink pairs that are separated by this deletion. The natural linear programming relaxation for multicut corresponds, by LP-duality, to the well-studied maximum (fractional) multicommodity flow problem, while the standard LP-relaxation for sparsest cut corresponds to maximum concurrent flow. Therefore, the integrality gap of the linear programming relaxation for multicut/sparsest cut is also theflow-cut gap: the largest gap, achievable for any graph, between the maximum flow value and the minimum cost solution for the corresponding cut problem. Our first result is that the flow-cut gap between maximum multicommodity flow and minimum multicut is Ω˜(n1/7) in directed graphs. We show a similar result for the gap between maximum concurrent flow and sparsest cut in directed graphs. These results improve upon a long-standing lower bound of Ω(logn) for both types of flow-cut gaps. We notice that these polynomially large flow-cut gaps are in a sharp contrast to the undirected setting where both these flow-cut gaps are known to be Θ(logn). Our second result is that both directed multicut and sparsest cut are hard to approximate to within a factor of 2Ω(log1-ϵn)for any constant ϵ > 0, unless NP ⊆ ZPP. This improves upon the recent Ω(logn/log logn)-hardness result for these problems. We also show that existence of PCP's for NP with perfect completeness, polynomially small soundness, and constant number of queries would imply a polynomial factor hardness of approximation for both these problems. All our results hold for directed acyclic graphs.

Key concepts: Minimum cut, Maximum cut, Maximum flow problem, Mathematics, Combinatorics, Multi-commodity flow problem, Linear programming relaxation, Minimum-cost flow problem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Polynomial flow-cut gaps and hardness of directed cut problems — Research Paper | ScholarLens