Catchment characteristics for index flood regionalisation
Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar, Dawei Han
Abstract
Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar, Dawei Han
Abstract
Flood frequency regionalisation for ungauged catchments depends on relevant catchment characteristics. In this study, alternative catchment characteristics for south-west England were derived using the data freely downloadable from the internet. It was found that the alternative catchment characteristics were more heterogeneous than the Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH) catchment descriptors. Therefore, they suffered less in information redundancy and had a potential to produce more reliable regression models. The results have demonstrated that the model from the alternative catchment characteristics had a better performance than the FEH model and FEH local model. It is also useful to note that a recalibrated FEH local model had a poorer performance than the original FEH model. This indicates that a national model should not simply be recalibrated using a regional data set. The methodology and catchment characteristics used in the present study are more applicable to other parts of the world than the catchment descriptors in the FEH due to the easier data access used in the present study.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Flood frequency regionalisation for ungauged catchments depends on relevant catchment characteristics. In this study, alternative catchment characteristics for south-west England were derived using the data freely downloadable from the internet. It was found that the alternative catchment characteristics were more heterogeneous than the Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH) catchment descriptors. Therefore, they suffered less in information redundancy and had a potential to produce more reliable regression models. The results have demonstrated that the model from the alternative catchment characteristics had a better performance than the FEH model and FEH local model. It is also useful to note that a recalibrated FEH local model had a poorer performance than the original FEH model. This indicates that a national model should not simply be recalibrated using a regional data set. The methodology and catchment characteristics used in the present study are more applicable to other parts of the world than the catchment descriptors in the FEH due to the easier data access used in the present study.
Key concepts: Regionalisation, Drainage basin, Catchment area, Flood myth, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Geography, Computer science