1991•Water Resources ResearchRequires access

Precipitation chemistry in and ionic loading to an Alpine Basin, Sierra Nevada

Mark W. Williams, John Michael Melack

Open publisher page 91 citations

Abstract

Wet deposition of solutes to an alpine catchment in the southern Sierra Nevada was measured from October 1984 through March 1988. Rainfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 4.9, and snowfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 5.3. Acetic and formic acids were important components of all wet deposition, contributing 25–30% of the measured anions in snowfall and, through analysis of charge balance deficits, the same percentage in rainfall. The NO3− to SO42− equivalent ratio for all wet deposition was 1.16. Ammonium concentration was tenfold greater than H+ in rainfall; ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate appear to be the principal nitrate and sulfate containing aerosols in wet deposition. Snowmelt runoff (1985 and 1986) or snowpack runoff plus rainfall during the period of snowpack runoff (1987) supplied 90% of the annual solute flux from wet deposition to the catchment. The amount of snow water equivalence (mm m−2) and H+, SO42−, and Cl− (eq m−2) in cumulative snowfall measured on snowboards was similar to the accumulated deposition of these parameters measured in snowpils at midwinter and during maximum snow accumulation periods, while about 20% of the NO3− in snowfall was not stored in the winter snowpack. Dry deposition was therefore not an important contributor of H+, NO3−, and SO42− to the winter snowpack. The source of the ions in snowfall was air masses that originated over the Pacific Ocean, while low Cl− and Na+ relative to NO3− and NH4+ in rainfall indicate that local urban and agricultural areas were the major source of the ions in rainfall.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wet deposition of solutes to an alpine catchment in the southern Sierra Nevada was measured from October 1984 through March 1988. Rainfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 4.9, and snowfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 5.3. Acetic and formic acids were important components of all wet deposition, contributing 25–30% of the measured anions in snowfall and, through analysis of charge balance deficits, the same percentage in rainfall. The NO3− to SO42− equivalent ratio for all wet deposition was 1.16. Ammonium concentration was tenfold greater than H+ in rainfall; ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate appear to be the principal nitrate and sulfate containing aerosols in wet deposition. Snowmelt runoff (1985 and 1986) or snowpack runoff plus rainfall during the period of snowpack runoff (1987) supplied 90% of the annual solute flux from wet deposition to the catchment. The amount of snow water equivalence (mm m−2) and H+, SO42−, and Cl− (eq m−2) in cumulative snowfall measured on snowboards was similar to the accumulated deposition of these parameters measured in snowpils at midwinter and during maximum snow accumulation periods, while about 20% of the NO3− in snowfall was not stored in the winter snowpack. Dry deposition was therefore not an important contributor of H+, NO3−, and SO42− to the winter snowpack. The source of the ions in snowfall was air masses that originated over the Pacific Ocean, while low Cl− and Na+ relative to NO3− and NH4+ in rainfall indicate that local urban and agricultural areas were the major source of the ions in rainfall.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wet deposition of solutes to an alpine catchment in the southern Sierra Nevada was measured from October 1984 through March 1988. Rainfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 4.9, and snowfall had a volume‐weighted pH of 5.3. Acetic and formic acids were important components of all wet deposition, contributing 25–30% of the measured anions in snowfall and, through analysis of charge balance deficits, the same percentage in rainfall. The NO3− to SO42− equivalent ratio for all wet deposition was 1.16. Ammonium concentration was tenfold greater than H+ in rainfall; ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate appear to be the principal nitrate and sulfate containing aerosols in wet deposition. Snowmelt runoff (1985 and 1986) or snowpack runoff plus rainfall during the period of snowpack runoff (1987) supplied 90% of the annual solute flux from wet deposition to the catchment. The amount of snow water equivalence (mm m−2) and H+, SO42−, and Cl− (eq m−2) in cumulative snowfall measured on snowboards was similar to the accumulated deposition of these parameters measured in snowpils at midwinter and during maximum snow accumulation periods, while about 20% of the NO3− in snowfall was not stored in the winter snowpack. Dry deposition was therefore not an important contributor of H+, NO3−, and SO42− to the winter snowpack. The source of the ions in snowfall was air masses that originated over the Pacific Ocean, while low Cl− and Na+ relative to NO3− and NH4+ in rainfall indicate that local urban and agricultural areas were the major source of the ions in rainfall.

Key concepts: Snowpack, Snow, Snowmelt, Surface runoff, Deposition (geology), Nitrate, Precipitation, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precipitation chemistry in and ionic loading to an Alpine Basin, Sierra Nevada — Research Paper | ScholarLens