2008Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory InvestigationRequires access

Repeatability of successive measurements with a portable nitric oxide analyser in patients with suggested or diagnosed asthma

Reijo Takalo, Päivi Piirilä, Anssi Sovijärvi

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The objective of our study was to determine the repeatability of successive measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) with a portable device (NIOX MINO). We assembled a sample of 332 pairs of repeated NO measurements acquired in the same session. The mean of the two successive measurements varied from 4.0 to 279.5 parts per billion (ppb). The mean coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of the entire study sample was 2.4 ppb. The difference between paired measurements increased slightly with increasing fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO); for the mean FENO of 24.0 ppb the calculated CoR was 2.2 and for the FENO of 54 ppb it was 3.2 ppb. The difference between paired observations for FENO values <50 ppb was significantly lower than that for values >50 ppb (p<0.001). The demonstrated repeatability of successive measurements with the device supports the view that, when the exhalation manoeuvre is technically valid and FENO is within normal limits, repeated determinations of FENO are generally not necessary for screening. In other cases, the mean value of two successive measurements would represent a more reliable measurement result.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of our study was to determine the repeatability of successive measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) with a portable device (NIOX MINO). We assembled a sample of 332 pairs of repeated NO measurements acquired in the same session. The mean of the two successive measurements varied from 4.0 to 279.5 parts per billion (ppb). The mean coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of the entire study sample was 2.4 ppb. The difference between paired measurements increased slightly with increasing fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO); for the mean FENO of 24.0 ppb the calculated CoR was 2.2 and for the FENO of 54 ppb it was 3.2 ppb. The difference between paired observations for FENO values <50 ppb was significantly lower than that for values >50 ppb (p<0.001). The demonstrated repeatability of successive measurements with the device supports the view that, when the exhalation manoeuvre is technically valid and FENO is within normal limits, repeated determinations of FENO are generally not necessary for screening. In other cases, the mean value of two successive measurements would represent a more reliable measurement result.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of our study was to determine the repeatability of successive measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) with a portable device (NIOX MINO). We assembled a sample of 332 pairs of repeated NO measurements acquired in the same session. The mean of the two successive measurements varied from 4.0 to 279.5 parts per billion (ppb). The mean coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of the entire study sample was 2.4 ppb. The difference between paired measurements increased slightly with increasing fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO); for the mean FENO of 24.0 ppb the calculated CoR was 2.2 and for the FENO of 54 ppb it was 3.2 ppb. The difference between paired observations for FENO values <50 ppb was significantly lower than that for values >50 ppb (p<0.001). The demonstrated repeatability of successive measurements with the device supports the view that, when the exhalation manoeuvre is technically valid and FENO is within normal limits, repeated determinations of FENO are generally not necessary for screening. In other cases, the mean value of two successive measurements would represent a more reliable measurement result.

Key concepts: Repeatability, Exhaled nitric oxide, Exhalation, Coefficient of variation, Analyser, Limits of agreement, Medicine, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Repeatability of successive measurements with a portable nitric oxide analyser in patients with suggested or diagnosed asthma — Research Paper | ScholarLens