2003disP - The Planning ReviewRequires access

Standortpolitik, State Rescaling and the New Metropolitan Governance in Western Europe

Neil Brenner

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

Throughout Western Europe, metropolitan governance is back on the agenda: since the early 1990s, new forms of citysuburban cooperation, regional coordination, region-wide spatial planning and metropolitan institutional reform have been promoted in major city-regions. In contrast to the forms of metropolitan governance that prevailed during the Fordist- Keynesian period, which emphasized administrative modernization, interterritorial equalization and the efficient delivery of public services, the newest wave of metropolitan governance is focused upon economic priorities such as territorial competitiveness and the imperative to attract external capital investment in the context of geoeconomic and European integration. This article develops an interpretation of the new metropolitan governance in Western Europe in two steps: First, the new metropolitan governance is situated in historical context by underscoring its qualitative differences from earlier waves of metropolitan institutional reform in Western European city-regions. Second, and on this basis, an interpretation of the new metropolitan regionalism in Western Europe is briefly introduced as a new form of locational politics (Standortpolitik) that is emerging in response to some of the failures and contradictions of earlier approaches to local economic development policy. From this perspective, contemporary forms of metropolitan institutional reform are key expressions of ongoing processes of state rescaling through which territorial competitiveness is being promoted at a regional scale, albeit in highly contradictory, often self-undermining ways.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Throughout Western Europe, metropolitan governance is back on the agenda: since the early 1990s, new forms of citysuburban cooperation, regional coordination, region-wide spatial planning and metropolitan institutional reform have been promoted in major city-regions. In contrast to the forms of metropolitan governance that prevailed during the Fordist- Keynesian period, which emphasized administrative modernization, interterritorial equalization and the efficient delivery of public services, the newest wave of metropolitan governance is focused upon economic priorities such as territorial competitiveness and the imperative to attract external capital investment in the context of geoeconomic and European integration. This article develops an interpretation of the new metropolitan governance in Western Europe in two steps: First, the new metropolitan governance is situated in historical context by underscoring its qualitative differences from earlier waves of metropolitan institutional reform in Western European city-regions. Second, and on this basis, an interpretation of the new metropolitan regionalism in Western Europe is briefly introduced as a new form of locational politics (Standortpolitik) that is emerging in response to some of the failures and contradictions of earlier approaches to local economic development policy. From this perspective, contemporary forms of metropolitan institutional reform are key expressions of ongoing processes of state rescaling through which territorial competitiveness is being promoted at a regional scale, albeit in highly contradictory, often self-undermining ways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Throughout Western Europe, metropolitan governance is back on the agenda: since the early 1990s, new forms of citysuburban cooperation, regional coordination, region-wide spatial planning and metropolitan institutional reform have been promoted in major city-regions. In contrast to the forms of metropolitan governance that prevailed during the Fordist- Keynesian period, which emphasized administrative modernization, interterritorial equalization and the efficient delivery of public services, the newest wave of metropolitan governance is focused upon economic priorities such as territorial competitiveness and the imperative to attract external capital investment in the context of geoeconomic and European integration. This article develops an interpretation of the new metropolitan governance in Western Europe in two steps: First, the new metropolitan governance is situated in historical context by underscoring its qualitative differences from earlier waves of metropolitan institutional reform in Western European city-regions. Second, and on this basis, an interpretation of the new metropolitan regionalism in Western Europe is briefly introduced as a new form of locational politics (Standortpolitik) that is emerging in response to some of the failures and contradictions of earlier approaches to local economic development policy. From this perspective, contemporary forms of metropolitan institutional reform are key expressions of ongoing processes of state rescaling through which territorial competitiveness is being promoted at a regional scale, albeit in highly contradictory, often self-undermining ways.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Corporate governance, Regionalism (politics), Context (archaeology), Political science, Modernization theory, European union, Regional science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Standortpolitik, State Rescaling and the New Metropolitan Governance in Western Europe — Research Paper | ScholarLens