Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Small Urban Transit
Jeremy Mattson, David Ripplinger
Abstract
Jeremy Mattson, David Ripplinger
Abstract
This study analyzes economies of scale and density as a rationale for subsidizing transit agencies in small urban areas. A long-run cost model is estimated with data from 2006 to 2009 for 168 transit agencies that directly operated fixed-route bus service in small urban areas. With vehicle revenue miles used as transit output, results show that small urban transit agencies experience economies of scale and density. A full-cost model is estimated; the model includes the addition of external costs and benefits. External benefits result from the reduced waiting times that follow an increase in service frequency. Results are used to estimate the optimal fare, which is equal to marginal social cost of service. The needed subsidy is calculated as the difference between the revenue generated by the optimal fare and that needed to maintain efficient levels of production. The rationale for subsidies is an important issue, as many agencies have experienced recent reductions in operational funding.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study analyzes economies of scale and density as a rationale for subsidizing transit agencies in small urban areas. A long-run cost model is estimated with data from 2006 to 2009 for 168 transit agencies that directly operated fixed-route bus service in small urban areas. With vehicle revenue miles used as transit output, results show that small urban transit agencies experience economies of scale and density. A full-cost model is estimated; the model includes the addition of external costs and benefits. External benefits result from the reduced waiting times that follow an increase in service frequency. Results are used to estimate the optimal fare, which is equal to marginal social cost of service. The needed subsidy is calculated as the difference between the revenue generated by the optimal fare and that needed to maintain efficient levels of production. The rationale for subsidies is an important issue, as many agencies have experienced recent reductions in operational funding.
Key concepts: Subsidy, Revenue, Transit (satellite), Marginal cost, Economies of scale, Transport engineering, Business, Service (business)