1994•Heat Transfer EngineeringRequires access

Comparison of Correction Factors for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers with Segmental or Helical Baffles

Petr Stehlı́k, J. Nemcansky, D. Kral, Larry W. Swanson

Open publisher page 172 citations

Abstract

Heat transfer and pressure drop correction factors based on the Bell-Delaware method have been compared for an optimized segmental baffle heat exchanger and a helical baffle heat exchanger. In general, the results showed that properly designed helical baffles offer a significant improvement in heat transfer while providing a reduced exchanger pressure drop. The enhancement in heat transfer for helical baffles was reflected by the so-called turbulence enhancement correction factor, which accounted for the increase in heat transfer observed at a critical baffle inclination angle of 25°. As the baffle inclination angle was increased beyond this critical angle, the turbulence enhancement factor continued to increase and eventually produced a maximum heal transfer enhancement of 1.39 times that for ideal cross-flow conditions. The reduction in pressure drop due to the helical baffles was found to vary from 0.26 to 0.60 depending on the helical inclination angle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Heat transfer and pressure drop correction factors based on the Bell-Delaware method have been compared for an optimized segmental baffle heat exchanger and a helical baffle heat exchanger. In general, the results showed that properly designed helical baffles offer a significant improvement in heat transfer while providing a reduced exchanger pressure drop. The enhancement in heat transfer for helical baffles was reflected by the so-called turbulence enhancement correction factor, which accounted for the increase in heat transfer observed at a critical baffle inclination angle of 25°. As the baffle inclination angle was increased beyond this critical angle, the turbulence enhancement factor continued to increase and eventually produced a maximum heal transfer enhancement of 1.39 times that for ideal cross-flow conditions. The reduction in pressure drop due to the helical baffles was found to vary from 0.26 to 0.60 depending on the helical inclination angle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 172 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Heat transfer and pressure drop correction factors based on the Bell-Delaware method have been compared for an optimized segmental baffle heat exchanger and a helical baffle heat exchanger. In general, the results showed that properly designed helical baffles offer a significant improvement in heat transfer while providing a reduced exchanger pressure drop. The enhancement in heat transfer for helical baffles was reflected by the so-called turbulence enhancement correction factor, which accounted for the increase in heat transfer observed at a critical baffle inclination angle of 25°. As the baffle inclination angle was increased beyond this critical angle, the turbulence enhancement factor continued to increase and eventually produced a maximum heal transfer enhancement of 1.39 times that for ideal cross-flow conditions. The reduction in pressure drop due to the helical baffles was found to vary from 0.26 to 0.60 depending on the helical inclination angle.

Key concepts: Baffle, Pressure drop, Materials science, Heat exchanger, Mechanics, Heat transfer, Heat transfer enhancement, Turbulence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Correction Factors for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers with Segmental or Helical Baffles — Research Paper | ScholarLens