2015Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsRequires access

Reply to “Comment on ‘Strongly magnetized cold degenerate electron gas: Mass-radius relation of the magnetized white dwarf’”

Upasana Das, Banibrata Mukhopadhyay

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf calculated by Nityananda and Konar [Phys. Rev. D 89, 103017 (2014)] and in the concerned comment, by the same authors, against our work [U. Das and B. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 86, 042001 (2012)] is erroneous. This in turn strengthens the argument in favor of the stability of the recently proposed magnetized super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs. We also point out several other numerical errors in their work. Overall we conclude that the arguments put forth by Nityananda and Konar are misleading.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf calculated by Nityananda and Konar [Phys. Rev. D 89, 103017 (2014)] and in the concerned comment, by the same authors, against our work [U. Das and B. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 86, 042001 (2012)] is erroneous. This in turn strengthens the argument in favor of the stability of the recently proposed magnetized super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs. We also point out several other numerical errors in their work. Overall we conclude that the arguments put forth by Nityananda and Konar are misleading.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf calculated by Nityananda and Konar [Phys. Rev. D 89, 103017 (2014)] and in the concerned comment, by the same authors, against our work [U. Das and B. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 86, 042001 (2012)] is erroneous. This in turn strengthens the argument in favor of the stability of the recently proposed magnetized super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs. We also point out several other numerical errors in their work. Overall we conclude that the arguments put forth by Nityananda and Konar are misleading.

Key concepts: Chandrasekhar limit, White dwarf, Physics, Degenerate energy levels, RADIUS, Magnetic field, Argument (complex analysis), Astrophysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reply to “Comment on ‘Strongly magnetized cold degenerate electron gas: Mass-radius relation of the magnetized white dwarf’” — Research Paper | ScholarLens