Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in academic versus community hospitals.
Rajiv Gandhi, Peggy Tso, Aileen M. Davis, Nizar N. Mahomed
Abstract
Rajiv Gandhi, Peggy Tso, Aileen M. Davis, Nizar N. Mahomed
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most joint-replacement surgeries are currently performed in community hospitals. We sought to determine whether the functional outcomes of joint-replacement surgery differ between academic and community hospitals. METHODS: We surveyed 471 patients for demographic data, Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores at baseline and at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. We assessed patient satisfaction at 1 year with a single survey question. RESULTS: Community hospital patients (n = 269) were significantly older and had greater comorbidity than academic hospital patients (n = 202; p < 0.05). We found no difference in WOMAC scores, SF-36 scores or in patient satisfaction between hospitals at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Adjusted analysis showed that patients undergoing surgery in an academic or community hospitals have the same functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the functional outcomes of joint-replacement surgery between academic and community hospitals. Further work will involve evaluating cost of care differences between these types of hospitals.
OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Most joint-replacement surgeries are currently performed in community hospitals. We sought to determine whether the functional outcomes of joint-replacement surgery differ between academic and community hospitals. METHODS: We surveyed 471 patients for demographic data, Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores at baseline and at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. We assessed patient satisfaction at 1 year with a single survey question. RESULTS: Community hospital patients (n = 269) were significantly older and had greater comorbidity than academic hospital patients (n = 202; p < 0.05). We found no difference in WOMAC scores, SF-36 scores or in patient satisfaction between hospitals at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Adjusted analysis showed that patients undergoing surgery in an academic or community hospitals have the same functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the functional outcomes of joint-replacement surgery between academic and community hospitals. Further work will involve evaluating cost of care differences between these types of hospitals.
Key concepts: Medicine, Joint arthroplasty, Joint replacement, Arthroplasty, Quality of life (healthcare), Physical therapy, Community hospital, MEDLINE