2013IEEE Transactions on CommunicationsRequires access

Low-Latency Polling Schemes for Long-Reach Passive Optical Networks

Mohammad S. Kiaei, Kerim Fouli, Michael Scheutzow, Martin Maier, Martin Reisslein, Chadi M. Assi

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The increased propagation delay of future long-reach passive optical networks (LR-PONs) may lead to a significantly increased idle time and delay if optical network units (ONUs) use conventional report-grant mechanisms. Sophisticated and efficient bandwidth allocation mechanisms are required to cope with the imposed propagation delay in LR-PONs. In this study, we evaluate three dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) frameworks in terms of frame (packet) delay; namely, we consider conventional (interleaved) polling for traditional PON and two recently introduced scheduling paradigms for next generation LR-PON, i.e., multi-thread polling (MT-P) and real-time polling (RT-P). We enhance MT-P and RT-P by applying the just-in-time framework. Next, we provide an analytical framework for evaluating the end-to-end frame delay in our enhanced MT-P and RT-P frameworks. We compare their performance with conventional polling and double-phase polling and investigate their shortcomings and advantages in an LR-PON setting. The simulation results closely match the analysis for this framework. Also, our results indicate that RT-P significantly reduces frame delay in LR-PONs compared to MT-P and conventional polling frameworks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The increased propagation delay of future long-reach passive optical networks (LR-PONs) may lead to a significantly increased idle time and delay if optical network units (ONUs) use conventional report-grant mechanisms. Sophisticated and efficient bandwidth allocation mechanisms are required to cope with the imposed propagation delay in LR-PONs. In this study, we evaluate three dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) frameworks in terms of frame (packet) delay; namely, we consider conventional (interleaved) polling for traditional PON and two recently introduced scheduling paradigms for next generation LR-PON, i.e., multi-thread polling (MT-P) and real-time polling (RT-P). We enhance MT-P and RT-P by applying the just-in-time framework. Next, we provide an analytical framework for evaluating the end-to-end frame delay in our enhanced MT-P and RT-P frameworks. We compare their performance with conventional polling and double-phase polling and investigate their shortcomings and advantages in an LR-PON setting. The simulation results closely match the analysis for this framework. Also, our results indicate that RT-P significantly reduces frame delay in LR-PONs compared to MT-P and conventional polling frameworks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The increased propagation delay of future long-reach passive optical networks (LR-PONs) may lead to a significantly increased idle time and delay if optical network units (ONUs) use conventional report-grant mechanisms. Sophisticated and efficient bandwidth allocation mechanisms are required to cope with the imposed propagation delay in LR-PONs. In this study, we evaluate three dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) frameworks in terms of frame (packet) delay; namely, we consider conventional (interleaved) polling for traditional PON and two recently introduced scheduling paradigms for next generation LR-PON, i.e., multi-thread polling (MT-P) and real-time polling (RT-P). We enhance MT-P and RT-P by applying the just-in-time framework. Next, we provide an analytical framework for evaluating the end-to-end frame delay in our enhanced MT-P and RT-P frameworks. We compare their performance with conventional polling and double-phase polling and investigate their shortcomings and advantages in an LR-PON setting. The simulation results closely match the analysis for this framework. Also, our results indicate that RT-P significantly reduces frame delay in LR-PONs compared to MT-P and conventional polling frameworks.

Key concepts: Polling, Passive optical network, Computer science, Dynamic bandwidth allocation, Computer network, Propagation delay, Frame (networking), Network packet

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Low-Latency Polling Schemes for Long-Reach Passive Optical Networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens