2014Journal of Structural EngineeringRequires access

Instrumentation of a Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge during Construction

Jeremiah Fasl, Jason Stith, Todd Helwig, Andrew Schuh, Jamie Farris, Michael D. Engelhardt, Eric B. Williamson, Karl H. Frank

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridges can present unique challenges for engineers and contractors because the curved geometry can result in a complicated torsional response. The most complicated stages for predicting behavior of the girders usually occur during erection and construction when the loads and support conditions are the most unpredictable. Although laboratory experiments can provide valuable insight into the behavior, the high cost of the specimens often precludes meaningful experiments, whereas field monitoring of bridges during construction provides invaluable opportunities to understand the behavior and gather data for validating computational models. A horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridge was instrumented to monitor the bridge during erection and concrete deck placement. Stresses were monitored as girders were lifted into position, followed by measurements of vertical deflections, rotations, and stresses during the concrete deck placement. The stresses during the erection process were relatively low owing to the proper use of lifting and placing methods; however, high stresses can be induced after girders are placed when the cross frames are ratcheted into position. As expected, higher stresses, compared with the steel erection process, were recorded during the concrete deck placement. Nonetheless, the monitored bridge did not have stability problems because the bridge utilized a relatively stocky flange width-to-depth ratio. For bridges more susceptible to stability challenges, such as tightly curved bridges, highly skewed bridges, narrow bridges, bridges with odd span arrangement, or some combination of these attributes, it is recommended that the designer consider the implication of slender girders and explicitly design for the possibility of construction-related stability challenges. In addition, resulting from the limited availability of field measurements of horizontally curved girders throughout the construction process, the data represent a valuable resource researchers can use to validate computational models for conducting parametric investigations. This paper outlines the methods used during the field monitoring and summarizes the results from the field measurements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridges can present unique challenges for engineers and contractors because the curved geometry can result in a complicated torsional response. The most complicated stages for predicting behavior of the girders usually occur during erection and construction when the loads and support conditions are the most unpredictable. Although laboratory experiments can provide valuable insight into the behavior, the high cost of the specimens often precludes meaningful experiments, whereas field monitoring of bridges during construction provides invaluable opportunities to understand the behavior and gather data for validating computational models. A horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridge was instrumented to monitor the bridge during erection and concrete deck placement. Stresses were monitored as girders were lifted into position, followed by measurements of vertical deflections, rotations, and stresses during the concrete deck placement. The stresses during the erection process were relatively low owing to the proper use of lifting and placing methods; however, high stresses can be induced after girders are placed when the cross frames are ratcheted into position. As expected, higher stresses, compared with the steel erection process, were recorded during the concrete deck placement. Nonetheless, the monitored bridge did not have stability problems because the bridge utilized a relatively stocky flange width-to-depth ratio. For bridges more susceptible to stability challenges, such as tightly curved bridges, highly skewed bridges, narrow bridges, bridges with odd span arrangement, or some combination of these attributes, it is recommended that the designer consider the implication of slender girders and explicitly design for the possibility of construction-related stability challenges. In addition, resulting from the limited availability of field measurements of horizontally curved girders throughout the construction process, the data represent a valuable resource researchers can use to validate computational models for conducting parametric investigations. This paper outlines the methods used during the field monitoring and summarizes the results from the field measurements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridges can present unique challenges for engineers and contractors because the curved geometry can result in a complicated torsional response. The most complicated stages for predicting behavior of the girders usually occur during erection and construction when the loads and support conditions are the most unpredictable. Although laboratory experiments can provide valuable insight into the behavior, the high cost of the specimens often precludes meaningful experiments, whereas field monitoring of bridges during construction provides invaluable opportunities to understand the behavior and gather data for validating computational models. A horizontally curved, steel I-girder bridge was instrumented to monitor the bridge during erection and concrete deck placement. Stresses were monitored as girders were lifted into position, followed by measurements of vertical deflections, rotations, and stresses during the concrete deck placement. The stresses during the erection process were relatively low owing to the proper use of lifting and placing methods; however, high stresses can be induced after girders are placed when the cross frames are ratcheted into position. As expected, higher stresses, compared with the steel erection process, were recorded during the concrete deck placement. Nonetheless, the monitored bridge did not have stability problems because the bridge utilized a relatively stocky flange width-to-depth ratio. For bridges more susceptible to stability challenges, such as tightly curved bridges, highly skewed bridges, narrow bridges, bridges with odd span arrangement, or some combination of these attributes, it is recommended that the designer consider the implication of slender girders and explicitly design for the possibility of construction-related stability challenges. In addition, resulting from the limited availability of field measurements of horizontally curved girders throughout the construction process, the data represent a valuable resource researchers can use to validate computational models for conducting parametric investigations. This paper outlines the methods used during the field monitoring and summarizes the results from the field measurements.

Key concepts: Girder, Deck, Structural engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Flange, Span (engineering), Engineering, Instrumentation (computer programming)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Instrumentation of a Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge during Construction — Research Paper | ScholarLens