2014Journal of Dr. YSR University of Health Sciences.Open access

Determination of implant stability by resonance frequency analysis device during early healing period

KLakshmi Kanth, DNarasimha Swamy, T. Krishna Mohan, Chakrapani Swarna, Sahitya Sanivarapu, Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the implant stability determined by Osstell Mentor® resonance frequency analysis unit during initial healing period with different bone density and whether resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be integrated into the routine clinical evaluation to determine the implant stability. Materials and Methods: To measure the implant stability, 24 patients with an age group of 20 yrs to 40 yrs were included in the study. In all patients implants were placed by one stage technique using life care dental implants. RFA was measured at the time of implant placement, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks by using Osstell Mentor® device. Bone density was classified according to Lekholm and Zarb index. Results: The overall mean minimum RFA value at the time of implant placement was 66.25 + 9.6 which gradually decreased to 63.25 + 11.4 at 4 weeks and gradually increased to 68.50 + 10.2 after 3 months. Mandibular implants showed higher values ranging from 68 to 72 compared to maxillary implants which ranged from 62 to 65. Type II bone showed higher values than type III bone. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software version 20. Conclusion: RFA by using Osstell TM mentor device is a non-invasive intraoral method designed to reflect the bone/implant interface and hence may be useful in documenting clinical implant stability and outcome of implant treatments. This test has been proven reliable for detecting alterations in implant stability during early healing and is sensitive enough to identify differences in implant stability based on bone density at the implant recipient site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the implant stability determined by Osstell Mentor® resonance frequency analysis unit during initial healing period with different bone density and whether resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be integrated into the routine clinical evaluation to determine the implant stability. Materials and Methods: To measure the implant stability, 24 patients with an age group of 20 yrs to 40 yrs were included in the study. In all patients implants were placed by one stage technique using life care dental implants. RFA was measured at the time of implant placement, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks by using Osstell Mentor® device. Bone density was classified according to Lekholm and Zarb index. Results: The overall mean minimum RFA value at the time of implant placement was 66.25 + 9.6 which gradually decreased to 63.25 + 11.4 at 4 weeks and gradually increased to 68.50 + 10.2 after 3 months. Mandibular implants showed higher values ranging from 68 to 72 compared to maxillary implants which ranged from 62 to 65. Type II bone showed higher values than type III bone. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software version 20. Conclusion: RFA by using Osstell TM mentor device is a non-invasive intraoral method designed to reflect the bone/implant interface and hence may be useful in documenting clinical implant stability and outcome of implant treatments. This test has been proven reliable for detecting alterations in implant stability during early healing and is sensitive enough to identify differences in implant stability based on bone density at the implant recipient site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the implant stability determined by Osstell Mentor® resonance frequency analysis unit during initial healing period with different bone density and whether resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be integrated into the routine clinical evaluation to determine the implant stability. Materials and Methods: To measure the implant stability, 24 patients with an age group of 20 yrs to 40 yrs were included in the study. In all patients implants were placed by one stage technique using life care dental implants. RFA was measured at the time of implant placement, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks by using Osstell Mentor® device. Bone density was classified according to Lekholm and Zarb index. Results: The overall mean minimum RFA value at the time of implant placement was 66.25 + 9.6 which gradually decreased to 63.25 + 11.4 at 4 weeks and gradually increased to 68.50 + 10.2 after 3 months. Mandibular implants showed higher values ranging from 68 to 72 compared to maxillary implants which ranged from 62 to 65. Type II bone showed higher values than type III bone. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software version 20. Conclusion: RFA by using Osstell TM mentor device is a non-invasive intraoral method designed to reflect the bone/implant interface and hence may be useful in documenting clinical implant stability and outcome of implant treatments. This test has been proven reliable for detecting alterations in implant stability during early healing and is sensitive enough to identify differences in implant stability based on bone density at the implant recipient site.

Key concepts: Resonance frequency analysis, Medicine, Implant, Dentistry, Implant stability quotient, Osseointegration, Bone density, Dental implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of implant stability by resonance frequency analysis device during early healing period — Research Paper | ScholarLens