Impact factor and research quality
Paolo Carbone
Abstract
Paolo Carbone
Abstract
The author discusses issues associated with the usage of the impact factor (IF) in the research community. The oversimplified usage of IF to capture the quality of the research products of a scientist is a malpractice that is affecting the scientific community and it tempts scientists into opportunistic and unethical behaviors. More than one indicator is needed to capture its properties, and IF alone as a journal reputation indicator does not suffice.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author discusses issues associated with the usage of the impact factor (IF) in the research community. The oversimplified usage of IF to capture the quality of the research products of a scientist is a malpractice that is affecting the scientific community and it tempts scientists into opportunistic and unethical behaviors. More than one indicator is needed to capture its properties, and IF alone as a journal reputation indicator does not suffice.
Key concepts: Reputation, Quality (philosophy), Impact factor, Malpractice, Factor (programming language), Computer science, Business, Actuarial science