1998Journal of Lower Genital Tract DiseaseRequires access

Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure

Mary Corkill, Danielle Knapp, Martha L. Hutchinson

Open publisher page 52 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of a fluid-based, thin-layer slide preparation system (ThinPrep; Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA), as compared to conventional Papanicolaou smears obtained with the endocervical brush and spatula sampling devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups totaling 1,583 patients, all of whom were attending Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains clinics, were included in the study. Cervical cell samples taken with the endocervical brush and plastic spatula were used first to make a conventional smear. Then the residual cells were rinsed into a vial containing preservative fluid, from which a ThinPrep slide was made. Screening and diagnosis of ThinPrep and conventional slides were blinded. RESULTS: The ThinPrep method demonstrated 110% greater detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses as compared to the conventional smear. The ThinPrep method yielded 54% more high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions than did the conventional smears. Review by an independent pathologist confirmed the significant increase in detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The data from more than 1,500 patients indicate improved sensitivity for the detection of disease with the ThinPrep cervical slide preparation method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of a fluid-based, thin-layer slide preparation system (ThinPrep; Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA), as compared to conventional Papanicolaou smears obtained with the endocervical brush and spatula sampling devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups totaling 1,583 patients, all of whom were attending Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains clinics, were included in the study. Cervical cell samples taken with the endocervical brush and plastic spatula were used first to make a conventional smear. Then the residual cells were rinsed into a vial containing preservative fluid, from which a ThinPrep slide was made. Screening and diagnosis of ThinPrep and conventional slides were blinded. RESULTS: The ThinPrep method demonstrated 110% greater detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses as compared to the conventional smear. The ThinPrep method yielded 54% more high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions than did the conventional smears. Review by an independent pathologist confirmed the significant increase in detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The data from more than 1,500 patients indicate improved sensitivity for the detection of disease with the ThinPrep cervical slide preparation method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the sensitivity of a fluid-based, thin-layer slide preparation system (ThinPrep; Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA), as compared to conventional Papanicolaou smears obtained with the endocervical brush and spatula sampling devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups totaling 1,583 patients, all of whom were attending Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains clinics, were included in the study. Cervical cell samples taken with the endocervical brush and plastic spatula were used first to make a conventional smear. Then the residual cells were rinsed into a vial containing preservative fluid, from which a ThinPrep slide was made. Screening and diagnosis of ThinPrep and conventional slides were blinded. RESULTS: The ThinPrep method demonstrated 110% greater detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses as compared to the conventional smear. The ThinPrep method yielded 54% more high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions than did the conventional smears. Review by an independent pathologist confirmed the significant increase in detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and more severe diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The data from more than 1,500 patients indicate improved sensitivity for the detection of disease with the ThinPrep cervical slide preparation method.

Key concepts: Medicine, Brush, Papanicolaou stain, Cytology, Papanicolaou Test, Vial, Gynecology, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure — Research Paper | ScholarLens