1994Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryRequires access

Long-Term Follow-Up of Nerve Conduction Velocity in Cross-Face Nerve Grafting for the Treatment of Facial Paralysis

Kazuki Ueda, Kiyonori Harii, Atsushi Yamada

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Motor nerve conduction velocity in a sural nerve graft crossing the face for the treatment of facial paralysis was measured postoperatively for more than 3 years. Forty-three cases of free gracilis muscle transplantation combined with a cross-face nerve graft were evaluated. The cross-face nerve graft was stimulated at two sites more than 5 cm apart by bipolar stimulating electrodes, and conduction velocity was calculated by dividing the length of this segment by the difference between the latencies of the evoked action potentials recorded from the grafted muscle. A tendency toward increase in motor nerve conduction velocity was noticed even 3 years after the sural nerve graft. This suggests that the grafted nerve has the potential to recover over a long period of time. The average velocity in measurements after the third postoperative year was 40.5 +/- 6.2 m/s (mean +/- SD), which corresponds to the lower limit of the normal value for the sural or facial nerve.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Motor nerve conduction velocity in a sural nerve graft crossing the face for the treatment of facial paralysis was measured postoperatively for more than 3 years. Forty-three cases of free gracilis muscle transplantation combined with a cross-face nerve graft were evaluated. The cross-face nerve graft was stimulated at two sites more than 5 cm apart by bipolar stimulating electrodes, and conduction velocity was calculated by dividing the length of this segment by the difference between the latencies of the evoked action potentials recorded from the grafted muscle. A tendency toward increase in motor nerve conduction velocity was noticed even 3 years after the sural nerve graft. This suggests that the grafted nerve has the potential to recover over a long period of time. The average velocity in measurements after the third postoperative year was 40.5 +/- 6.2 m/s (mean +/- SD), which corresponds to the lower limit of the normal value for the sural or facial nerve.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Motor nerve conduction velocity in a sural nerve graft crossing the face for the treatment of facial paralysis was measured postoperatively for more than 3 years. Forty-three cases of free gracilis muscle transplantation combined with a cross-face nerve graft were evaluated. The cross-face nerve graft was stimulated at two sites more than 5 cm apart by bipolar stimulating electrodes, and conduction velocity was calculated by dividing the length of this segment by the difference between the latencies of the evoked action potentials recorded from the grafted muscle. A tendency toward increase in motor nerve conduction velocity was noticed even 3 years after the sural nerve graft. This suggests that the grafted nerve has the potential to recover over a long period of time. The average velocity in measurements after the third postoperative year was 40.5 +/- 6.2 m/s (mean +/- SD), which corresponds to the lower limit of the normal value for the sural or facial nerve.

Key concepts: Medicine, Sural nerve, Nerve conduction velocity, Facial nerve, Anatomy, Paralysis, Electromyography, Transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Long-Term Follow-Up of Nerve Conduction Velocity in Cross-Face Nerve Grafting for the Treatment of Facial Paralysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens