Barter and Cash Sale on Lake Titicaca: A Test of Competing Approaches [and Comments and Replies]
Ben Orlove, James Acheson, John Clammer, Thomas Crump, Stephen Gudeman, David Guillet, Olivia Harris, Henry J. Rutz
Abstract
Ben Orlove, James Acheson, John Clammer, Thomas Crump, Stephen Gudeman, David Guillet, Olivia Harris, Henry J. Rutz
Abstract
A review of recent work in economic anthropology finds three competing approaches: decision theory, culturalism, and neo-Marxism. These approaches are tested with data on four dimensions of the cash sale and barter of fish on Lake Titicaca, Peru. The first is somewhat more successful, although the others also explain some data. Comparisons are drawn with barter and cash sale elsewhere in the Andes.
OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A review of recent work in economic anthropology finds three competing approaches: decision theory, culturalism, and neo-Marxism. These approaches are tested with data on four dimensions of the cash sale and barter of fish on Lake Titicaca, Peru. The first is somewhat more successful, although the others also explain some data. Comparisons are drawn with barter and cash sale elsewhere in the Andes.
Key concepts: Barter, Cash, Test (biology), Culturalism, Work (physics), Fish <Actinopterygii>, Economics, Geography