1996Terra NovaRequires access

The kinematic paradox of the San Andreas Fault

Carlo Doglioni, Paolo Harabaglia

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Pacific‐North America plate boundary along the San Andreas fault system is notoriously a right‐lateral transpressive margin where both almost pure thrust and strike‐slip tectonics take place. The Pacific plate travels WNW, forming an angle of about 25° with the boundary. Since the Pacific is moving WNW faster than North America, right lateral transtension should result along the San Andreas system. North America, in turn, travels westward obliquely to the boundary and a left‐lateral transpressive component would be expected along the same margin. Therefore, the right‐lateral transpression of the San Andreas system can be partitioned into (i) a sinistral transpression along the southwestern margin of the North America plate obliquely overriding (ii) a faster right lateral transtension occurring along the transfer margin of the Pacific plate between the East Pacific rise in the California Gulf and the Gorda ridge to the north‐west. This is due to the oblique trend of the Pacific and North America plate margins with respect to their motion in a absolute reference frame. The geodynamics of California is marked by a unique setting in which there is a special subduction where, in contrast with classic subduction zones, the footwall of the subduction plane is obliquely diverging from the hanging wall in an E‐W section, while it is converging at slower rates in a NE‐SW direction. The extensional E‐W component is absorbed into the Basin and Range rifting, whereas the compressive NE‐SW component is mainly expressed in the Coast Ranges and California offshore. The compression perpendicular to the San Andreas is then not intrinsic in the strike‐slip movement, but it is rather an independent tectonic factor. Therefore, the San Andreas system cannot be considered as an archetype of a pure strike slip fault.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The Pacific‐North America plate boundary along the San Andreas fault system is notoriously a right‐lateral transpressive margin where both almost pure thrust and strike‐slip tectonics take place. The Pacific plate travels WNW, forming an angle of about 25° with the boundary. Since the Pacific is moving WNW faster than North America, right lateral transtension should result along the San Andreas system. North America, in turn, travels westward obliquely to the boundary and a left‐lateral transpressive component would be expected along the same margin. Therefore, the right‐lateral transpression of the San Andreas system can be partitioned into (i) a sinistral transpression along the southwestern margin of the North America plate obliquely overriding (ii) a faster right lateral transtension occurring along the transfer margin of the Pacific plate between the East Pacific rise in the California Gulf and the Gorda ridge to the north‐west. This is due to the oblique trend of the Pacific and North America plate margins with respect to their motion in a absolute reference frame. The geodynamics of California is marked by a unique setting in which there is a special subduction where, in contrast with classic subduction zones, the footwall of the subduction plane is obliquely diverging from the hanging wall in an E‐W section, while it is converging at slower rates in a NE‐SW direction. The extensional E‐W component is absorbed into the Basin and Range rifting, whereas the compressive NE‐SW component is mainly expressed in the Coast Ranges and California offshore. The compression perpendicular to the San Andreas is then not intrinsic in the strike‐slip movement, but it is rather an independent tectonic factor. Therefore, the San Andreas system cannot be considered as an archetype of a pure strike slip fault.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The Pacific‐North America plate boundary along the San Andreas fault system is notoriously a right‐lateral transpressive margin where both almost pure thrust and strike‐slip tectonics take place. The Pacific plate travels WNW, forming an angle of about 25° with the boundary. Since the Pacific is moving WNW faster than North America, right lateral transtension should result along the San Andreas system. North America, in turn, travels westward obliquely to the boundary and a left‐lateral transpressive component would be expected along the same margin. Therefore, the right‐lateral transpression of the San Andreas system can be partitioned into (i) a sinistral transpression along the southwestern margin of the North America plate obliquely overriding (ii) a faster right lateral transtension occurring along the transfer margin of the Pacific plate between the East Pacific rise in the California Gulf and the Gorda ridge to the north‐west. This is due to the oblique trend of the Pacific and North America plate margins with respect to their motion in a absolute reference frame. The geodynamics of California is marked by a unique setting in which there is a special subduction where, in contrast with classic subduction zones, the footwall of the subduction plane is obliquely diverging from the hanging wall in an E‐W section, while it is converging at slower rates in a NE‐SW direction. The extensional E‐W component is absorbed into the Basin and Range rifting, whereas the compressive NE‐SW component is mainly expressed in the Coast Ranges and California offshore. The compression perpendicular to the San Andreas is then not intrinsic in the strike‐slip movement, but it is rather an independent tectonic factor. Therefore, the San Andreas system cannot be considered as an archetype of a pure strike slip fault.

Key concepts: Transpression, Geology, Transtension, Pacific Plate, Subduction, North American Plate, Seismology, Plate tectonics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The kinematic paradox of the San Andreas Fault — Research Paper | ScholarLens