1982Annals of Applied BiologyRequires access

Control of whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum and cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii in glasshouses by two isolates of the fungus, Verticillium lecanii

Richard Hall

Open publisher page 82 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY The abilities of two isoiates of the entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii (one isolated from whitefly and one from aphids), to control both aphids and whitefly on glasshouse cucumbers was investigated. Control of homologous hosts was better than that of heterologous hosts. A single spray of a commercial substrate‐containing formulation of the ‘whitefly’ isolate controlled established whitefly populations satisfactorily on sprayed foliage and also when the whitefly moved up to younger untreated foliage. In addition, because the substrate permitted growth and sporulation of the fungus on leaf surfaces, whitefly populations introduced after a V. lecanii application were also controlled. Control of whitefly by the ‘aphid’ isolate alone was unsatisfactory although control could be obtained in conjunction with the hymenopterous parasite Encarsia formosa. Control of Aphis gossypii by the ‘aphid’ isolate was obtained by spraying a commercial formulation containing a substrate but not by spraying pure spore suspensions. The ‘whitefly’ isolate did not control aphids satisfactorily. The difference between the two isolates in pathogenicity for aphids and whitefly was supported by laboratory infectivity experiments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY The abilities of two isoiates of the entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii (one isolated from whitefly and one from aphids), to control both aphids and whitefly on glasshouse cucumbers was investigated. Control of homologous hosts was better than that of heterologous hosts. A single spray of a commercial substrate‐containing formulation of the ‘whitefly’ isolate controlled established whitefly populations satisfactorily on sprayed foliage and also when the whitefly moved up to younger untreated foliage. In addition, because the substrate permitted growth and sporulation of the fungus on leaf surfaces, whitefly populations introduced after a V. lecanii application were also controlled. Control of whitefly by the ‘aphid’ isolate alone was unsatisfactory although control could be obtained in conjunction with the hymenopterous parasite Encarsia formosa. Control of Aphis gossypii by the ‘aphid’ isolate was obtained by spraying a commercial formulation containing a substrate but not by spraying pure spore suspensions. The ‘whitefly’ isolate did not control aphids satisfactorily. The difference between the two isolates in pathogenicity for aphids and whitefly was supported by laboratory infectivity experiments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 82 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY The abilities of two isoiates of the entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii (one isolated from whitefly and one from aphids), to control both aphids and whitefly on glasshouse cucumbers was investigated. Control of homologous hosts was better than that of heterologous hosts. A single spray of a commercial substrate‐containing formulation of the ‘whitefly’ isolate controlled established whitefly populations satisfactorily on sprayed foliage and also when the whitefly moved up to younger untreated foliage. In addition, because the substrate permitted growth and sporulation of the fungus on leaf surfaces, whitefly populations introduced after a V. lecanii application were also controlled. Control of whitefly by the ‘aphid’ isolate alone was unsatisfactory although control could be obtained in conjunction with the hymenopterous parasite Encarsia formosa. Control of Aphis gossypii by the ‘aphid’ isolate was obtained by spraying a commercial formulation containing a substrate but not by spraying pure spore suspensions. The ‘whitefly’ isolate did not control aphids satisfactorily. The difference between the two isolates in pathogenicity for aphids and whitefly was supported by laboratory infectivity experiments.

Key concepts: Whitefly, Trialeurodes, Biology, Aphis gossypii, Greenhouse whitefly, Aphid, Entomopathogenic fungus, Aphis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Control of whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum and cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii in glasshouses by two isolates of the fungus, Verticillium lecanii — Research Paper | ScholarLens