2013Unpublished venueRequires access

On the Accuracy of Trace Replay Methods for File System Evaluation

Thiago Emmanuel Pereira, Lívia Sampaio, Francisco Brasileiro

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.

Key concepts: TRACE (psycholinguistics), Workload, Computer science, Real-time computing, Representation (politics), Operating system, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Accuracy of Trace Replay Methods for File System Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens