The Initiation and Release of Retrieval Inhibition
Phillip N. Goernert, Michael E. Larson
Abstract
Phillip N. Goernert, Michael E. Larson
Abstract
Subjects free recalled or were cued with either four or eight retrieval cues in a modified directed-forgetting study. A directed-forgetting effect was observed for free but not cued recall. In addition, the same cues that initiated blocking for “remember” words were observed to release the suppression for “forget” words. An explanation of the differential effect of experimenter-provided retrieval cues on the retrieval of remember and forget words is provided.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Subjects free recalled or were cued with either four or eight retrieval cues in a modified directed-forgetting study. A directed-forgetting effect was observed for free but not cued recall. In addition, the same cues that initiated blocking for “remember” words were observed to release the suppression for “forget” words. An explanation of the differential effect of experimenter-provided retrieval cues on the retrieval of remember and forget words is provided.
Key concepts: Retrieval-induced forgetting, Forgetting, Cued speech, Cue-dependent forgetting, Cued recall, Motivated forgetting, Recall, Psychology