1981European Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

Interferon‐induced enhancement of macrophage‐mediated tumor cytolysis and its difference from activation by lymphokines

Diana Boraschi, Aldo Tagliabue

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

Mouse peritoneal macrophages expressed increased cytolytic activity against tumor cells upon in vitro exposure to partially purified L cell interferon (IFN-beta). In contrast, treatment with human IFN or with mock IFN preparations did not enhance macrophage tumoricidal capacity. Macrophage activation by IFN was optimal with long exposure times and high IFN concentrations. Treatment with polymyxin B sulfate did not affect IFN-induced macrophage cytotoxicity, thus excluding the possibility that bacterial lipopolysaccharide contaminants were responsible for macrophage activation. Conversely, treatment with a highly specific anti-IFN antiserum completely abolished IFN effect on macrophages, but had no effect on lymphokine-induced cytolysis. IFN and the lymphokine macrophage-activating factor (MAF) were compared for their ability to provide the sequence of activation signals to macrophages from the normal responder C3H/HeN mice and from C3H/HeJ mice, which are defective for several macrophage responses. Like MAF, IFN was incapable of inducing tumoricidal activity in C3H/HeJ macrophages. However, whereas MAF provided the first "priming" signal to macrophages of both strains, IFN acted as first signal only for C3H/HeN macrophages, being inactive for cells of the defective C3H/HeJ strain. Furthermore, IFN was not capable of providing the second "expression" signal to "primed" macrophages. These data suggest two different macrophage activation pathways for IFN and MAF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mouse peritoneal macrophages expressed increased cytolytic activity against tumor cells upon in vitro exposure to partially purified L cell interferon (IFN-beta). In contrast, treatment with human IFN or with mock IFN preparations did not enhance macrophage tumoricidal capacity. Macrophage activation by IFN was optimal with long exposure times and high IFN concentrations. Treatment with polymyxin B sulfate did not affect IFN-induced macrophage cytotoxicity, thus excluding the possibility that bacterial lipopolysaccharide contaminants were responsible for macrophage activation. Conversely, treatment with a highly specific anti-IFN antiserum completely abolished IFN effect on macrophages, but had no effect on lymphokine-induced cytolysis. IFN and the lymphokine macrophage-activating factor (MAF) were compared for their ability to provide the sequence of activation signals to macrophages from the normal responder C3H/HeN mice and from C3H/HeJ mice, which are defective for several macrophage responses. Like MAF, IFN was incapable of inducing tumoricidal activity in C3H/HeJ macrophages. However, whereas MAF provided the first "priming" signal to macrophages of both strains, IFN acted as first signal only for C3H/HeN macrophages, being inactive for cells of the defective C3H/HeJ strain. Furthermore, IFN was not capable of providing the second "expression" signal to "primed" macrophages. These data suggest two different macrophage activation pathways for IFN and MAF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mouse peritoneal macrophages expressed increased cytolytic activity against tumor cells upon in vitro exposure to partially purified L cell interferon (IFN-beta). In contrast, treatment with human IFN or with mock IFN preparations did not enhance macrophage tumoricidal capacity. Macrophage activation by IFN was optimal with long exposure times and high IFN concentrations. Treatment with polymyxin B sulfate did not affect IFN-induced macrophage cytotoxicity, thus excluding the possibility that bacterial lipopolysaccharide contaminants were responsible for macrophage activation. Conversely, treatment with a highly specific anti-IFN antiserum completely abolished IFN effect on macrophages, but had no effect on lymphokine-induced cytolysis. IFN and the lymphokine macrophage-activating factor (MAF) were compared for their ability to provide the sequence of activation signals to macrophages from the normal responder C3H/HeN mice and from C3H/HeJ mice, which are defective for several macrophage responses. Like MAF, IFN was incapable of inducing tumoricidal activity in C3H/HeJ macrophages. However, whereas MAF provided the first "priming" signal to macrophages of both strains, IFN acted as first signal only for C3H/HeN macrophages, being inactive for cells of the defective C3H/HeJ strain. Furthermore, IFN was not capable of providing the second "expression" signal to "primed" macrophages. These data suggest two different macrophage activation pathways for IFN and MAF.

Key concepts: Lymphokine, Cytolysis, Macrophage-activating factor, Macrophage, Biology, Lipopolysaccharide, Interferon, Monokine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interferon‐induced enhancement of macrophage‐mediated tumor cytolysis and its difference from activation by lymphokines — Research Paper | ScholarLens