1994•Publius The Journal of FederalismRequires access

County Compliance with North Carolina's Solid-Waste Mandate: A Conflict-Based Model

Stephen Jenks

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

This article presents the findings of research on the implementation of intergovernmental mandates. A framework is developed from empirical and theoretical work in conflict management to assess the response of government actors in the implementation of a specific mandate—North Carolina's Solid Waste Management Act of 1989. Our expectation is that the imposition of a mandate by the state on local governments would produce conflict and contention, especially if the mandate is not accompanied by funding. However, this study indicates that state and local governments may be able to overcome a single-minded concern for their own interests and take on a problem-solving attitude during the implementation process. In addition, evidence indicates that county governments that take a problem solving approach are more likely to achieve the intended policy outcomes, producing the potential for win-win results for the state and its counties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article presents the findings of research on the implementation of intergovernmental mandates. A framework is developed from empirical and theoretical work in conflict management to assess the response of government actors in the implementation of a specific mandate—North Carolina's Solid Waste Management Act of 1989. Our expectation is that the imposition of a mandate by the state on local governments would produce conflict and contention, especially if the mandate is not accompanied by funding. However, this study indicates that state and local governments may be able to overcome a single-minded concern for their own interests and take on a problem-solving attitude during the implementation process. In addition, evidence indicates that county governments that take a problem solving approach are more likely to achieve the intended policy outcomes, producing the potential for win-win results for the state and its counties.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article presents the findings of research on the implementation of intergovernmental mandates. A framework is developed from empirical and theoretical work in conflict management to assess the response of government actors in the implementation of a specific mandate—North Carolina's Solid Waste Management Act of 1989. Our expectation is that the imposition of a mandate by the state on local governments would produce conflict and contention, especially if the mandate is not accompanied by funding. However, this study indicates that state and local governments may be able to overcome a single-minded concern for their own interests and take on a problem-solving attitude during the implementation process. In addition, evidence indicates that county governments that take a problem solving approach are more likely to achieve the intended policy outcomes, producing the potential for win-win results for the state and its counties.

Key concepts: Mandate, Compliance (psychology), Municipal solid waste, Waste management, Political science, Engineering, Psychology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
County Compliance with North Carolina's Solid-Waste Mandate: A Conflict-Based Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens