Present State of the Surface Potential Measurements by Kelvin Force Microscopy. Atomic-scale Potential Imaging by Ultrahigh Vacuum Scanning Probe Microscopy.
Shinichi Kitamura, Katsuyuki Suzuki, Masashi Iwatsuki
Abstract
Open-access reader
Shinichi Kitamura, Katsuyuki Suzuki, Masashi Iwatsuki
Abstract
Open-access reader
The contact potential difference (CPD) imaging of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces and the effect of CPD distribution on NC-AFM data are discussed. Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPM) based on the measurement of electrostatic force gradient was applied under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) to acquire the data. The CPD images of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces are virtually identical, irrespective of the deposited metals. Detailed analysis has revealed that the CPD images showing the atomically resolved potential difference, does not represent the intrinsic work function of the materials but reflects the local electron density on the surface. On the other hand, the average potential that corresponds to the DC level of the CPD image is considered to reflect the work function on the surface.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The contact potential difference (CPD) imaging of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces and the effect of CPD distribution on NC-AFM data are discussed. Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPM) based on the measurement of electrostatic force gradient was applied under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) to acquire the data. The CPD images of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces are virtually identical, irrespective of the deposited metals. Detailed analysis has revealed that the CPD images showing the atomically resolved potential difference, does not represent the intrinsic work function of the materials but reflects the local electron density on the surface. On the other hand, the average potential that corresponds to the DC level of the CPD image is considered to reflect the work function on the surface.
Key concepts: Kelvin probe force microscope, Volta potential, Work function, Scanning probe microscopy, Microscopy, Atomic force microscopy, Scanning electron microscope, Non-contact atomic force microscopy