2001Hyomen KagakuOpen access

Present State of the Surface Potential Measurements by Kelvin Force Microscopy. Atomic-scale Potential Imaging by Ultrahigh Vacuum Scanning Probe Microscopy.

Shinichi Kitamura, Katsuyuki Suzuki, Masashi Iwatsuki

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The contact potential difference (CPD) imaging of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces and the effect of CPD distribution on NC-AFM data are discussed. Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPM) based on the measurement of electrostatic force gradient was applied under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) to acquire the data. The CPD images of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces are virtually identical, irrespective of the deposited metals. Detailed analysis has revealed that the CPD images showing the atomically resolved potential difference, does not represent the intrinsic work function of the materials but reflects the local electron density on the surface. On the other hand, the average potential that corresponds to the DC level of the CPD image is considered to reflect the work function on the surface.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The contact potential difference (CPD) imaging of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces and the effect of CPD distribution on NC-AFM data are discussed. Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPM) based on the measurement of electrostatic force gradient was applied under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) to acquire the data. The CPD images of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces are virtually identical, irrespective of the deposited metals. Detailed analysis has revealed that the CPD images showing the atomically resolved potential difference, does not represent the intrinsic work function of the materials but reflects the local electron density on the surface. On the other hand, the average potential that corresponds to the DC level of the CPD image is considered to reflect the work function on the surface.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The contact potential difference (CPD) imaging of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces and the effect of CPD distribution on NC-AFM data are discussed. Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPM) based on the measurement of electrostatic force gradient was applied under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) to acquire the data. The CPD images of Ag- and Au-deposited Si(111) 7×7 surfaces are virtually identical, irrespective of the deposited metals. Detailed analysis has revealed that the CPD images showing the atomically resolved potential difference, does not represent the intrinsic work function of the materials but reflects the local electron density on the surface. On the other hand, the average potential that corresponds to the DC level of the CPD image is considered to reflect the work function on the surface.

Key concepts: Kelvin probe force microscope, Volta potential, Work function, Scanning probe microscopy, Microscopy, Atomic force microscopy, Scanning electron microscope, Non-contact atomic force microscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Present State of the Surface Potential Measurements by Kelvin Force Microscopy. Atomic-scale Potential Imaging by Ultrahigh Vacuum Scanning Probe Microscopy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens