2007SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Has Arbitration Failed India or Has India Failed Arbitration

Sarah Elisabeth Hilmer

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The current Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was enacted in order to make the Indian Law of arbitration more responsive to contemporary requirements by looking at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Model Law). The earlier arbitration law was not considered as being as effective as it should have been. The main reason was that the former arbitration law did only cover dispute settlements of domestic nature compared to the 1996 Act. The 1996 Act seeks to provide an effective mode of settlement for domestic as well as international commercial arbitration. In addition, methods of conciliation have also been introduced, since none of the earlier laws provided any mode of conciliation between the parties. A number of changes were made. However, a number of challenges occur such as appoinment of arbitrator, venue, costs, delays, and courts' interventions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was enacted in order to make the Indian Law of arbitration more responsive to contemporary requirements by looking at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Model Law). The earlier arbitration law was not considered as being as effective as it should have been. The main reason was that the former arbitration law did only cover dispute settlements of domestic nature compared to the 1996 Act. The 1996 Act seeks to provide an effective mode of settlement for domestic as well as international commercial arbitration. In addition, methods of conciliation have also been introduced, since none of the earlier laws provided any mode of conciliation between the parties. A number of changes were made. However, a number of challenges occur such as appoinment of arbitrator, venue, costs, delays, and courts' interventions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was enacted in order to make the Indian Law of arbitration more responsive to contemporary requirements by looking at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Model Law). The earlier arbitration law was not considered as being as effective as it should have been. The main reason was that the former arbitration law did only cover dispute settlements of domestic nature compared to the 1996 Act. The 1996 Act seeks to provide an effective mode of settlement for domestic as well as international commercial arbitration. In addition, methods of conciliation have also been introduced, since none of the earlier laws provided any mode of conciliation between the parties. A number of changes were made. However, a number of challenges occur such as appoinment of arbitrator, venue, costs, delays, and courts' interventions.

Key concepts: Conciliation, Arbitration, Compulsory arbitration, Law, Commission, Settlement (finance), Political science, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Has Arbitration Failed India or Has India Failed Arbitration — Research Paper | ScholarLens