1981Unpublished venueRequires access

Strategic Voting in Multicandidate Elections under Uncertainty and under Risk

Samuel Merrill

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

A number of voting systems for multicandidate elections stipulate that the voter may, under certain constraints, cast v i ≥ 0 votes for the i-th candidate, i = 1,..., K (where K is the number of candidates), and that the candidate receiving the greatest total vote wins. We will refer to these methods as numerical voting systems. Each can be characterized by the constraints imposed: e.g., simple plurality voting permits one of the vi to be 1 but the others must be 0; approval voting permits each of the v i to be either 0 or 1; the Borda system requires that the set |v i : i = 1,..., K} consist of the numbers K-1, K-2, ..., 0; cardinal measure voting requires that 0 ≤ v i ≤ M for some fixed positive number M. For background on these and other multicandidate voting systems, see Black [1958], Brams [1978], Merrill [1980], and Weber [1978].

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of voting systems for multicandidate elections stipulate that the voter may, under certain constraints, cast v i ≥ 0 votes for the i-th candidate, i = 1,..., K (where K is the number of candidates), and that the candidate receiving the greatest total vote wins. We will refer to these methods as numerical voting systems. Each can be characterized by the constraints imposed: e.g., simple plurality voting permits one of the vi to be 1 but the others must be 0; approval voting permits each of the v i to be either 0 or 1; the Borda system requires that the set |v i : i = 1,..., K} consist of the numbers K-1, K-2, ..., 0; cardinal measure voting requires that 0 ≤ v i ≤ M for some fixed positive number M. For background on these and other multicandidate voting systems, see Black [1958], Brams [1978], Merrill [1980], and Weber [1978].

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of voting systems for multicandidate elections stipulate that the voter may, under certain constraints, cast v i ≥ 0 votes for the i-th candidate, i = 1,..., K (where K is the number of candidates), and that the candidate receiving the greatest total vote wins. We will refer to these methods as numerical voting systems. Each can be characterized by the constraints imposed: e.g., simple plurality voting permits one of the vi to be 1 but the others must be 0; approval voting permits each of the v i to be either 0 or 1; the Borda system requires that the set |v i : i = 1,..., K} consist of the numbers K-1, K-2, ..., 0; cardinal measure voting requires that 0 ≤ v i ≤ M for some fixed positive number M. For background on these and other multicandidate voting systems, see Black [1958], Brams [1978], Merrill [1980], and Weber [1978].

Key concepts: Voting, Cardinal voting systems, Anti-plurality voting, Approval voting, Ranked voting system, Bullet voting, Disapproval voting, Mathematical economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strategic Voting in Multicandidate Elections under Uncertainty and under Risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens