2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Opening the local

Michael P. Cañares

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

In 2011, the Philippine government required local government units (LGUs) to post financial and procurement--related information in LGU websites. This research investigates whether this initiative has affected both the providers of the information and its supposed audience -- the public, as represented by citizen groups. To answer the questions, the researchers made use of a case study approach by selecting three provinces as research sites which yielded two major findings. On the supply side, incentivising openness is a critical aspect in ensuring that local governments have the interest to disclose financial data. However, on the demand side, there is limited awareness on the part of the public, and more particularly the intermediaries (e.g. business groups, civil society organizations, research institutions), on the availability of data, and thus, its limited use. This paper argues that openness is not just about governments putting meaningful government data out into the public domain, but also about making the public meaningfully engage with governments. This requires policies that will require observance of open government data standards and a capacity building process of ensuring that the public, to whom the data is intended, are aware and able to use the data in ensuring more transparent and accountable governance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2011, the Philippine government required local government units (LGUs) to post financial and procurement--related information in LGU websites. This research investigates whether this initiative has affected both the providers of the information and its supposed audience -- the public, as represented by citizen groups. To answer the questions, the researchers made use of a case study approach by selecting three provinces as research sites which yielded two major findings. On the supply side, incentivising openness is a critical aspect in ensuring that local governments have the interest to disclose financial data. However, on the demand side, there is limited awareness on the part of the public, and more particularly the intermediaries (e.g. business groups, civil society organizations, research institutions), on the availability of data, and thus, its limited use. This paper argues that openness is not just about governments putting meaningful government data out into the public domain, but also about making the public meaningfully engage with governments. This requires policies that will require observance of open government data standards and a capacity building process of ensuring that the public, to whom the data is intended, are aware and able to use the data in ensuring more transparent and accountable governance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2011, the Philippine government required local government units (LGUs) to post financial and procurement--related information in LGU websites. This research investigates whether this initiative has affected both the providers of the information and its supposed audience -- the public, as represented by citizen groups. To answer the questions, the researchers made use of a case study approach by selecting three provinces as research sites which yielded two major findings. On the supply side, incentivising openness is a critical aspect in ensuring that local governments have the interest to disclose financial data. However, on the demand side, there is limited awareness on the part of the public, and more particularly the intermediaries (e.g. business groups, civil society organizations, research institutions), on the availability of data, and thus, its limited use. This paper argues that openness is not just about governments putting meaningful government data out into the public domain, but also about making the public meaningfully engage with governments. This requires policies that will require observance of open government data standards and a capacity building process of ensuring that the public, to whom the data is intended, are aware and able to use the data in ensuring more transparent and accountable governance.

Key concepts: Open government, Openness to experience, Procurement, Business, Public relations, Local government, Government (linguistics), Transparency (behavior)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Opening the local — Research Paper | ScholarLens