2002•American Journal of Medical Genetics Part ARequires access

True hermaphroditism with ambiguous genitalia due to a complicated mosaic karyotype: Clinical features, cytogenetic findings, and literature review

Dalit Modan‐Moses, Talia Litmanovitch, Shlomit Rienstein, Joseph Meyerovitch, Boleslaw Goldman, Ayala Aviram‐Goldring

Open publisher page 90 citations

Abstract

Abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during meiosis, occurring outside the pseudoautosomal region, can result in translocation of the SRY gene from the Y to the X chromosome, and consequently in abnormal sexual differentiation, such as the development of 46,XX males or true hermaphroditism. In this report we present clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular-cytogenetic data of a patient with ambiguous genitalia and true hermaphroditism, who had a unique mosaic karyotype, comprising three different cell lines: 46,XX(SRY+), 45,X(SRY+), and 45,X. The mosaic karyotype of our patient probably represents two different events: abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during paternal meiosis, and postzygotic loss of one of the X chromosomes. Replication studies demonstrated that in 80% of the XX cells, the SRY sequence was located on the active X chromosome. This finding suggests nonrandom X inactivation and, together with the presence of the SRY gene, explains the male phenotype of our patient. On the other hand, the presence of the 45,X cell line may have contributed to genital ambiguity. We conclude that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with SRY probes is highly recommended and allows accurate diagnosis and optimal management in cases of 46,XX hermaphroditism and ambiguous genitalia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during meiosis, occurring outside the pseudoautosomal region, can result in translocation of the SRY gene from the Y to the X chromosome, and consequently in abnormal sexual differentiation, such as the development of 46,XX males or true hermaphroditism. In this report we present clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular-cytogenetic data of a patient with ambiguous genitalia and true hermaphroditism, who had a unique mosaic karyotype, comprising three different cell lines: 46,XX(SRY+), 45,X(SRY+), and 45,X. The mosaic karyotype of our patient probably represents two different events: abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during paternal meiosis, and postzygotic loss of one of the X chromosomes. Replication studies demonstrated that in 80% of the XX cells, the SRY sequence was located on the active X chromosome. This finding suggests nonrandom X inactivation and, together with the presence of the SRY gene, explains the male phenotype of our patient. On the other hand, the presence of the 45,X cell line may have contributed to genital ambiguity. We conclude that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with SRY probes is highly recommended and allows accurate diagnosis and optimal management in cases of 46,XX hermaphroditism and ambiguous genitalia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 90 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during meiosis, occurring outside the pseudoautosomal region, can result in translocation of the SRY gene from the Y to the X chromosome, and consequently in abnormal sexual differentiation, such as the development of 46,XX males or true hermaphroditism. In this report we present clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular-cytogenetic data of a patient with ambiguous genitalia and true hermaphroditism, who had a unique mosaic karyotype, comprising three different cell lines: 46,XX(SRY+), 45,X(SRY+), and 45,X. The mosaic karyotype of our patient probably represents two different events: abnormal recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during paternal meiosis, and postzygotic loss of one of the X chromosomes. Replication studies demonstrated that in 80% of the XX cells, the SRY sequence was located on the active X chromosome. This finding suggests nonrandom X inactivation and, together with the presence of the SRY gene, explains the male phenotype of our patient. On the other hand, the presence of the 45,X cell line may have contributed to genital ambiguity. We conclude that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with SRY probes is highly recommended and allows accurate diagnosis and optimal management in cases of 46,XX hermaphroditism and ambiguous genitalia.

Key concepts: Testis determining factor, Pseudoautosomal region, Biology, Karyotype, True hermaphroditism, Y chromosome, Genetics, Meiosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
True hermaphroditism with ambiguous genitalia due to a complicated mosaic karyotype: Clinical features, cytogenetic findings, and literature review — Research Paper | ScholarLens